User talk:AllanBz

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome, newcomer!

Here are some useful tips to ease you into the Wikipedia experience:


Also, here are some odds and ends that I find useful from time to time:

Feel free to ask me anything the links and talk pages don't answer. You can most easily reach me by posting on my talk page.

You can sign your name on any page by typing 4 tildes, likes this: SteveCrossinBot (talk) 07:46, 10 May 2008 (UTC).[reply]

Best of luck, and have fun!

ClockworkSoul 04:26, 28 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Smalltalk[edit]

Hi, I was told that you moved Smalltalk from "Academic" to "Industrial" in Template:Major programming languages small. Could you please explain your justification for this? —Sean κ. 16:36, 19 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Co-redemptrix[edit]

Please see the comments at Talk:Five solas#Solus Christus. --Flex 12:57, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Cynicism[edit]

Finally someone who knows what Cynicism really is. Thanks. Str1977 08:33, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)

What is BJAODN ? Str1977 28 June 2005 18:53 (UTC)

Ok, done. Str1977 28 June 2005 19:43 (UTC)

You may be interested[edit]

You might be interested in this current vote: Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/List of Roman Catholics -Doohickey

Your signature[edit]

You did not sign your comment/vote at Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/List of Roman Catholics ( just add ~~~~ to sign) NoSeptember 02:38, 29 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Have you seen these?[edit]

Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/List of Catholic Actresses and Actors and Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/List of Catholic Criminals Doohickey 16:34, 12 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Just to let you know that Wikipedia style is to place punctuation outside quotation marks (unless the punctuation is part of what's being quoted), and that we use the serial comma. Also, the subjects of articles shouls be referred to by their surnames, not their first names. --Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 10:22, 13 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your response; my apologies for suggesting that you hadn't used commas correctly — you had of course. However, the placing of punctuation outside inverted commas does indeed apply to titles (even if they did imply full stops, which I don't think that they do, that wouldn't explain placing commas inside inverted commas). I agree, though, that your work on the article improved it immensely. --Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 23:18, 14 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi thank you for joining the WikiProject. Being a small group currently there is still plenty of scope for influencing things and making your contribution count. We are about establishing standards for Novel based articles and writing articles that meet our own and others high standards, and to improve Wikipedia's diet of articles on Fiction books, otherwise called Novels. If you have any questions, do ask. Please be very welcome. :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page) 09:34, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Allan,

I'm sorry to say I don't know for sure. But Iohannes Tzimiskes is listed under John I Tzimiskes, so I suppose John can stay. Thanks for fixing double-redirects - that was slack of me. Cheers, Slac speak up! 23:31, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation style[edit]

Thank you for your work on NUC. Unfortunately, disambiguation pages do not follow the same stylistic rules as normal pages. In particular,

  • there should be only one live link per entry.
  • entries should show their true names and not use piped links.
  • alphabetical or chronological order is good, but when there is a small number of "most important" items, those should be placed at the top.

Please see the disambiguation style guide for more information. If you have any questions not answered there, drop me a note or try the help desk. By the way, I have already brought NUC into line with the guidelines. Matchups 12:33, January 26, 2007 (UTC)

Sorry, I tried going through the history to figure out who had done what and I think I inadvertently attributed to you issues which had been introduced by subsequent editors. I will try to be more careful next time. I generally sign my posts and probably forgot because I had my handle in the body of the comment; I've corrected that omission above. Matchups 14:49, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Novels WikiProject Newsletter - Issue XVII - October 2007[edit]

The October 2007 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot -- 09:21, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Novels WikiProject Newsletter - Issue XVIII - November 2007[edit]

The November 2007 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot -- 15:17, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Novels WikiProject Newsletter - Issue XIX - December 2007[edit]

The December 2007 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by KevinalewisBot -- 10:19, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Byzantine literature[edit]

Yes it's the 2007 version and don't worry, I'm not using their text. I rewrote the meaning of their text in my own words. I can't see how this could be cited with greater precision. Btw I kept the sections of the catholic encyclopedia, eventhough I believe they should be removed. Miskin (talk) 15:54, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Novels WikiProject Newsletter - Issue XX - January 2008[edit]

The January 2008 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by KevinalewisBot -- 12:42, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Novels WikiProject Newsletter - Issue XXI - February 2008[edit]

The February 2008 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by KevinalewisBot --10:23, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Novels WikiProject Newsletter - Issue XXII - March 2008[edit]

The March 2008 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This is an automated delivery by KevinalewisBot --15:48, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Novels - 1st Coordinators Election[edit]

An election has been proposed and has been set up for this project. Description of the roles etc., can be found at Wikipedia:WikiProject Novels/Coordinators. If you wish to stand, enter your candidacy before the end of March and ask your questions of anyone already standing at Wikipedia:WikiProject Novels/Coordinators/May 2008. Voting will start on the 1st April and close at the end of April. The intention is for the appointments to last from May - November 2008. For other details check out the pages or ask. KevinalewisBot (talk) 12:02, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Novels WikiProject Newsletter - Issue XXIII - April 2008[edit]

Archives  |  Tip Line  |  Editors

The Novels WikiProject Newsletter
Issue XXIII - April 2008
Project news
  • Elections are now taking place for coordinators of the project for the next six months. Any editors interested in seeking a coordinator position, or who want a say in who is selected, should indicate as much here.
Member news
  • The project has currently 381 members, 69 joined & 0 leavers since the start of March 2008.
Other news
Task force news
Novel related news
Current debates
  • There is a discussion regarding further task forces for other genres of fiction now taking place here.
From the Members

Welcome to the Twenty Third issue of the Novels WikiProject's newsletter! Use this newsletter as a mechanism to inform yourselves about progress at the project and please be inspired to take more active roles in what we do.

We would encourage all members to get more involved and if you are wondering what with, please ask.

Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/(Desk), Initiating Editor

Collaboration of the Month
Newsletter challenge

Last month's challenge (South Wind) was completed by member User:Blathnaid with a nice starting stub.

  • The first person to start the article is mentioned in the next newsletter. This month's article is Kate Christensen's 2008 PEN/Faulkner award winner The Great Man.

To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here.

John Carter (talk) 17:47, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Novels WikiProject Newsletter - Issue XXIV - May 2008[edit]

The May 2008 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. SteveCrossinBot (talk) 07:46, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Novels WikiProject Newsletter - Issue XXV - June 2008[edit]

The June 2008 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. SteveBot (owner) 23:28, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Calling all active WP:NOVELS members[edit]

WikiProject Novels Roll Call

WikiProject Novels is currently holding a roll call, which we hope to have annually. Your username is listed on the members list, but we are unsure as to which editors are still active within the project. If you still consider yourself an active WP:Novels editor, please add your name back to the Active Members list. Also feel free to join any of our task forces and take a look at the project's Job Centre to get involved!

Next month we will begin the coordinator election selection process. We hope to have more involvement and input this time around! More news will be forthcoming. Thanks, everyone! María (habla conmigo) 14:17, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Novels Newsletter - September 2008[edit]

This newsletter was automatically delivered by TinucherianBot (talk) 14:20, 10 September 2008 (UTC) [reply]

Proposed deletion of Valesius[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Valesius, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Erik the Red 2 ~~~~ 01:58, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notability tag on Edward Catich page[edit]

Hi there! The Edward Catich page was not proposed for deletion. It seems this subject may indeed be notable, but that notability should be established through independent sources, not just through a bibliography of books written by the subject. I therefore tagged it as requiring more sources to establish its notability. Please see the guidelines on independent sources. You mention in your message on my talk page that search engines link to sources that verify this subject's notability. Those may include independent sources that the article could link to. Respectfully, --lightspeedchick (talk) 23:13, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RTTS[edit]

You've done an edit or two on RTTS. It's been nominated for deletion, according to some twisting of WP policy. Could you weigh in on this? --141.160.5.251 (talk) 20:44, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs[edit]

Hello AllanBz! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 2 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 942 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

  1. George A. Spadoro - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  2. Rachel Hadas - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 00:15, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:57, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hiatus[edit]

All I wanted to do was fix a prehistoric Shasta marine diapsid. Now I’m going through vandalized pages, fixing help pages, reading through templates. Just when I thought I was out, they pull me back in! Gah! Someone is wrong on the Internet! → AllanBz  20:34, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:21, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]