Wikipedia:Peer review/Screenwriting credit/archive1

Screenwriting credit

I'd appreciate our film buffs and anyone with experience in Hollywood looking through this. I've got an article, a section of links, a good bibliography, a see also section. It needs some fresh pairs of eyes to look through it. PedanticallySpeaking 18:22, Jan 27, 2005 (UTC)

• I would definately put the "External links" section at the very end. Also, maybe a screen shot of a proper screenwriting credit would be nice. Also, the title of the article should be in the first sentence in bold. Otherwise, very nice article! [jon] [talk] 17:14, 1 Feb 2005 (UTC)

• Thanks, Jon. I did put the name in the lead and tweaked it some. I didn't want the external links to be last because they provide links to official material and to some of the disputes I mentioned. I didn't want that to get lost by being last. As for screenshots, that's a good idea, but I don't have the capabilities to do such a thing. Some of the complicated credits I mention would be good places to start. Also think of big action movies--they tend to have more convoluted origins. PedanticallySpeaking 19:54, Feb 1, 2005 (UTC)

• The manual of style recommends it however. I did this before I read what you wrote here... - Ta bu shi da yu 02:14, 16 Feb 2005 (UTC)

• A fascinating article! However, can't other countries have a screenwriting credit system? This seems to be focused on the WGA's credit system. - Ta bu shi da yu 02:39, 24 Feb 2005 (UTC)