Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Foreskin folding

Foreskin folding

Listed for speedy deletion by User:Mooses with the comment: yuck. While I agree with the comment, this is not a valid reason to delete. Furthermore, this article does not meet the narrow criteria for speedy deletion. No vote from myself, by the way. • Benc • 06:19, 22 Sep 2004 (UTC)

• Not so yuck, but Delete (after folding into Foreskin :-). It is not a medical or anatomical term. There are many things one can do with foreskin. Mikkalai 06:30, 22 Sep 2004 (UTC)
• Delete Sorry, but I don't think Wikipedia needs every type of thing one can do to their precious bodily part. squash 06:40, Sep 22, 2004 (UTC)
• Delete. Elbow bending is the act of moving your forearm but we don't need an article on that either. silsor 06:42, Sep 22, 2004 (UTC)
• Delete, fifteen Google hits does not an article make. Don't need an article about every combination of genital and gerund. Fuzheado | Talk 06:43, 22 Sep 2004 (UTC)
• This makes an excellent companion-piece for Traumatic Masturbatory Syndrome - Nunh-huh 06:51, 22 Sep 2004 (UTC)
• Keep, it's an insightful article. Delete. I'd rather have it deleted, then played around with hack writers. unsigned comment by User:Foreskin, creator of the article
  • don't worry, no-one will be playing around with your foreskin, uh foreskin texts.--Ianb 07:16, 22 Sep 2004 (UTC)
• Surely this content should be part of the foreskin article, and this article title should simply redirect to foreskin? -- The Anome 07:08, 22 Sep 2004 (UTC)
• This is pretty much covered in Foreskin#Hygiene. Delete --Ianb 07:16, 22 Sep 2004 (UTC)
• Delete: No need for a redirect, non-encyclopedic and not significant. We don't need foreskin origami either. Geogre 12:44, 22 Sep 2004 (UTC)
  • Actually...genital origami appears to be another name for Puppetry of the Penis on which we do in fact have an article.--Samuel J. Howard 07:05, Sep 23, 2004 (UTC)
  • Aww, but I was going to write an article about my boyfriend's- err, nevermind. Delete. -FZ 15:38, 22 Sep 2004 (UTC)
• Delete, redundant information about hygene already covered in foreskin. -- Zwilson 17:13, 22 Sep 2004 (UTC)
• Delete. Redundant article, already covered at foreskin. — Gwalla | Talk 18:24, 22 Sep 2004 (UTC)
• Delete. What's next, Thumb twiddling? Fire Star 22:53, 22 Sep 2004 (UTC)

• Delete. Actually, Thumb twiddling would probably be a more interesting and useful article. Jayjg 02:07, 23 Sep 2004 (UTC)
  • I couldn't resist the temptation. KeyStroke 07:20, 2004 Sep 23 (UTC)