User talk:Lejean2000

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia, Lejean2000! I hope you like the place and decide to keep contributing. Since I see you've already been active here, let me just give you a few links that are always useful as a handy reference guide:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question at the village pump or feel free to ask me on my Talk page.
Oh, and just in case you don't already know: to sign your name on a Talk page like I did below, the easiest way is just to type four tildes (~~~~). To customize your signature, look here.
And remember:Be Bold!

— Asbestos | Talk 09:29, 30 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Ammonites[edit]

If you think you can help standardize the Ammonite classification, please do. I worked on it quite a bit last year, and it's a labryinth: many different schemes. And people keep monkeying with it as well. Please improve it if you think you can. --DanielCD 20:01, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Neale Monks actually has an account and edits from time to time. On his talk page is a question I asked him about "ida" and "ina" endings in Ammonite classification. We might ask him to suggest a classification scheme. Thought you might be interested. --DanielCD 23:01, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Frog won![edit]

Thank you for your support of the Article Improvement Drive.
This week Frog was selected to be improved to featured article status.
Hope you can help…

Dijxtra 21:24, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Frog FAC[edit]

Hi,

If you'd like to add a comment and signature to our nomination of frog as a featured article, please see Wikipedia:Featured_article_candidates/Frog.

Best,

Samsara _contrib ^talk 11:41, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

liquidGhoul's RfA[edit]

Hi Lejean,

I'm not a fan of campaigning for adminship, but I thought you might want to know about this: Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/LiquidGhoul. Some people complained that they didn't know about my RfA, and it seems we all attained some fame with that Featured Article frog!

Best,

Samsara (talk • contribs) 19:24, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nqwebasaurus[edit]

Hi Lejean,

Thank you for your recent contributions to Nqwebasaurus. If you can think of more to add to the article, or to other dinosaur articles, please feel free to do so. We don't get a lot of serious contributions to most dinosaur articles. Thanks again. Best wishes and happy editing, Firsfron of Ronchester 08:29, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Triassic-jurassic boundary.jpg[edit]

Hi Lejean,

This is a really useful image, but I wonder about your inclusion of the Megalosauridae as Triassic fauna. I'm having difficulty locating sources which indicate there were Megalosaurids in the Triassic, and our current article on Megalosaurid doesn't mention anything about the Triassic. Is there a good source for this? Happy editing, Firsfron of Ronchester 20:29, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Firsfron, The image you mention does not indicate Megalosauridae as Triassic - the grey rectangle starts right after the boundary. This may also be incorrect, because the earliest fossils I know of are Bajocian [Waldman, M. (1974). Megalosaurids from the Bajocian (Middle Jurassic) of Dorset. Palaeontology 17(2):325-339] not Hettangian as the image suggests. I'll have to re-check my data about this image. Thanks for your remark. Lejean2000 07:02, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I did misread the chart (moved over one line), but as you say Early Jurassic seems a bit early. It's worth a double-check. Thanks for your time. Firsfron of Ronchester 08:05, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Biflustra_savartii.gif[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Biflustra_savartii.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 04:30, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Hiscobeccus capax.jpg[edit]

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Hiscobeccus capax.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Polly (Parrot) 22:06, 28 April 2008 (UTC) --Polly (Parrot) 22:06, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ezra P. Ewers[edit]

This is an automated message from VWBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Ezra P. Ewers, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.onlinebiographies.info/ny/jeff/ewers-ep-lc.htm.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) VWBot (talk) 15:23, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:17, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Lejean2000. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Lejean2000. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Lejean2000. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:V pavurdziev.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:V pavurdziev.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 19:30, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]