User talk:Hob Gadling

Oscillococcinum

Please don't call this the "the stupidest quackery of all". You're just tempting fate for someone to conjure up an even stupider one. DMacks (talk) 14:38, 9 February 2024 (UTC)

New legal article

I have finished enough of Consciousness of guilt (legal) to go public with it. Further development and improvement will be appreciated. -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 19:26, 2 April 2024 (UTC)

Um... are you on the right Talk page? I have neither expertise nor a lot of interest in the subject. --Hob Gadling (talk) 08:26, 3 April 2024 (UTC)

I, apparently mistakenly, thought it might interest you. Carry on. -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 14:19, 3 April 2024 (UTC)

Talkback

Seeking a response on the proposal here. Thanks. AbsoluteWissen (talk) 13:03, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

If I were interested, I had responded. --Hob Gadling (talk) 13:30, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

Climate change

Why did you revert my request for a citation to a statement that all theories on nonanthropogenic climate change are false? BBeagle (talk) 16:57, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

New stuff goes to the bottom. Don't just insert it at a random place.

I wrote the reason in the edit summary: There is already a citation, at the end of the sentence. BTW, anthropogenic climate change has not been controversial in science for several decades. Only ideologically blinded, ignorant people disagree with it for self-serving reasons. Read Scientific consensus on climate change and Climate change denial. Also WP:FRINGE, WP:YWAB and WP:CHARLATANS. --Hob Gadling (talk) 19:30, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

Ah right: This is what article talk pages are for, not user talk pages. --Hob Gadling (talk) 19:32, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

May 2024

Hi Hob Gadling! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of an article several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. Félix An (talk) 09:22, 14 May 2024 (UTC)

1. This is about the article, not about me.
2. Check [1] to find out whether your claim you have reverted to restore your preferred version of an article several times is true. It is very obviously not.

You are not welcome on my talk page. Please refrain from editing it in the future. --Hob Gadling (talk) 10:27, 14 May 2024 (UTC)

WWI myths

Hi, Hob. Thanks for your comment at Talk. I am away with spotty wifi and it’s hard to edit with only my phone, especially for formatted citations. Can you have a look at this and see if you can help out? Thanks. Mathglot (talk) 09:26, 16 May 2024 (UTC)