Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dwang/Archive1

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was no consensus. —Xezbeth 18:46, May 11, 2005 (UTC)

Dwang

DicDef that has been Transwikied to Wiktionary and is unlikely to become an encyclopedia article. Not to mention I'm not even sure it's true. Kevin Rector (talk) 04:48, Apr 26, 2005 (UTC)

• Delete, dictionary definition. Megan1967 08:21, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Keep classes of object are encyclopedic. Could be expanded to explain the construction and usage of dwangs. Kappa 10:56, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Construction of dwangs: "Put a piece of wood between a stud and you have a dwang." Usage of dwangs: "Dwangs are used to stiffen studs." That's not encyclopedic. Kevin Rector (talk) 13:49, Apr 26, 2005 (UTC)
  • Could be notable to somone seeking a stiffer stud. Klonimus 06:36, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, the article is growing. ping 08:35, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Merge to stud then. Radiant_* 08:45, Apr 27, 2005 (UTC)
• Still a dicdef. Delete or merge and redirect to stud. Rossami (talk) 23:41, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Don't twang your dwang! Nestea 00:54, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.