Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ukkiki
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was - no consensus - SimonP 21:29, Apr 11, 2005 (UTC)
Delete. Exceedingly minor video game character: a hat-stealing monkey from Super Mario 64; that article already contains all non-trivial information about said monkey. android↔talk 05:21, Mar 24, 2005 (UTC)
- Merge or keep fancruft. Wikipedia has plenty of space for "trivial" information. Kappa 06:28, 24 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Redirects are cheap. Everything not already in Super Mario 64 (and there's hardly any) is gamefaqs material. —Korath (Talk) 06:53, Mar 24, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, not notable, gamescruft. Megan1967 07:13, 24 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Merge as minor character. Radiant_* 09:23, Mar 24, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, non-encyclopedic. Martg76 10:12, 24 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Redirect to Super Mario 64. Ukkiki already mentioned there, so no merge is necessary. DaveTheRed 19:16, 24 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, mariocruft. Do not redirect. ComCat 05:25, 25 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Redirect to Super Mario 64.--Matteh (talk) 09:21, 25 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Redirect Fawcett5 03:56, 29 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Do not Delete Do anything else, but don't delete it. I am the author of this article, and Ukkiki shows up in many Mario Party games as well, not just Super Mario 64. The article could be expanded with a picture, or further description. One should also consider that this article was created at the time Super Mario 64 was the main page article, and in that high traffic time, no one else seemed to think it was inappropriate. Whatever decision is reached here, however, should also be applied to Unagi, which I also wrote. RyanGerbil10 00:12, 2 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Keep based on RyanGerbil10's expansion of the article and new information. - SimonP 21:29, Apr 11, 2005 (UTC)
- This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.