Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boldog
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was - kept - SimonP 05:14, Mar 29, 2005 (UTC)
Boldog[edit]
Is this a speculative rant which needs to be deleted, or a truly noteworthy and encyclopedic article worthy of inclusion? What can be said of its ultimate potential? You decide. --GRider\talk 20:32, 11 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Keep. Well-cited material, and there's enough here to not need merging. —Korath (Talk) 20:56, Mar 11, 2005 (UTC)
- keep, not speculative or a rant. Kappa 23:05, 11 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Keep, cleanup and expand. Megan1967 23:48, 11 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- This might serve better if it were briefly merged into Orc (Middle-earth). It's a very minor concept, although somewhat interesting. -Aranel ("Sarah") 23:52, 11 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Merge it as above. Wyss 01:54, 12 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, nn tolkiencruft. ComCat 02:12, 12 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Merge and redirect. Not so crufty. Useful information. RickK 05:06, Mar 13, 2005 (UTC)
- Merge and redirect - David Gerard 15:44, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Keep. Everyking 15:46, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Keep. —Markaci 2005-03-14 T 09:14 Z
- KEEP - Tolkien's orcs articles merit more development than the present wide spread use of journaling in Wikipedia to cover adult material. -- John Gohde 14:18, 18 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Keep. Looks fine to me. Bryan 04:45, 19 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Merge it as above --GingerM 18:40, 27 Mar 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.