Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pacific Coast

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was KEEP. Postdlf 09:33, 9 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Pacific Coast[edit]

"The Pacific Coast is any coast fronting the Pacific Ocean." Not certain whether stating the obvious is a reason for vfd'ing something, but transwiki'ing is the only viable way I can see of this being saved. Grutness|^hello? 02:57, 3 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Delete only because I can't see a way to make this much better, it sounds like a simple definition is all that you will ever have. Vegaswikian 05:20, 3 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, because people will have an automatic tendency to link here, it should remain as a disambig to all the articles on Pacific coasts wikipedia has (currently just West Coast of the United States it seems). I added something about Japan's Pacific Coast. Kappa 08:46, 3 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Notable coast. Lots of things are notable about the pacific coast, for example California Sea Lion .Klonimus 08:55, 3 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- I know - I live only 200 metres from the Pacific coast - not that there are any Californian sea lions within 5000 miles of here (Hooker's sea lions, yes). I should add the New Zealand coast to this now-saveable article. Grutness|^hello? 13:32, 3 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, still stubby, but addition on Japanese coast makes it keepable. Mgm|^(talk) 09:08, May 3, 2005 (UTC)
Keep--Cyberjunkie 14:35, 3 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and {{split}} —msh210 19:22, 3 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as re-written. --Carnildo 20:45, 3 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- article has matured into something worth keeping with some tweaks here and there. - Longhair | Talk 21:26, 3 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - article is now a huge improvement on original version. Well done, Kappa and Grutness and others although more work still needed. Capitalistroadster 08:01, 4 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep decent enough article now

Keep revised article --AYArktos 23:57, 8 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.