Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pictari

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was - deleted - SimonP 15:18, Mar 31, 2005 (UTC)

Pictari

Non-notable. Delete. Alexa test 346,921; Google test 367. No reason for notability known by me or noted in the article. Page creator 81.178.3.151 (talk · contributions) has spammed the link to the website on a lot of unrelated articles (not in itself a reason for deletion, but shows bad faith). cesarb 23:49, 19 Mar 2005 (UTC)

• Notable communities should really get more google hits. The spamming also causes me to suspect advertising. Delete. Mgm|^(talk) 23:59, Mar 19, 2005 (UTC)
• Based on evidence presented, I concur. Delete. Rossami (talk) 06:20, 20 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Delete without better independent evidence that anyone cares - David Gerard 19:03, 20 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Note: 82.69.54.206 (talk · contributions) has also been spamming the link to other unrelated articles, and reverted the neutering of the link on Pictari. Perhaps the link should be added to the list of spammed links? --cesarb 01:25, 30 Mar 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.