Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Nass

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was - deleted - SimonP 00:01, Jun 16, 2005 (UTC)

Daniel Nass

Obscure modern classical composer. Is modern classical a jumbo shrimp? 242 google hits. Seems unimportant. His site. humblefool® 02:18, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)

• • I assume you meant Jumbo shrimp? —Wahoofive (talk) 19:29, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete drini ☎ 02:19, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Weak Keep. Looking through "Daniel Nass" composer on google, it seems that he has some notability. My knowledge of modern classical music is weak, but I don't feel comfortable deleting him at this time. --Scimitar 14:46, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete vanity. The guy's a grad student, for crying out loud. Those google hits are just representative of a certain flair for self-promotion. —Wahoofive (talk) 19:29, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, vanity (but quite understated vanity). --Angr/_{tɔk tə mi} 06:32, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)

After the fact: I would like to point out that Daniel Nass the composer did not write that article. My name is also Daniel Nass and I wrote that article after finding out about him via Google. So it wasn't a vanity article.

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.