Talk:Titoism

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Retrospect[edit]

In retrospect, I can't help but wonder how this principle named after Tito and his application of it in Yugoslavia can be called "nationalistic". The whole point was to have state sovereignty, not national sovereignty, far from it. --Joy [shallot] 11:01, 13 Dec 2004 (UTC)

"Religious aspect"[edit]

A propo this paragraph: "The religious elements of Titoism are characterized by strong loyalty, admiration, and at an extreme, fanatical devotion to Tito, who by means of the cult of personality that surrounded him, was believed by some to be a deity or alternatively, to be more than a mortal human-being."

This paragraph seems terribly POV and very far-fetched. I don't think anyone saw Tito as a deity or "more than a mortal", despite the whole cult of his name. If nobody complains, I will remove the paragraph. --Dejan Čabrilo 2 July 2005 03:52 (UTC)

"or even those who respected Russian culture." - till someone gives a reference I ll remove it. Luka Jačov 18:58, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It should resurrect and stay permanently, if it wasn't for Titoism, my people would not have received human rights. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.95.114.241 (talk) 01:52, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Tito-portret-jovanovic.jpg[edit]

Image:Tito-portret-jovanovic.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 02:19, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

General help[edit]

This is an important part of 20th century history but lacking in context and details. Is anyone interested in improving it? Obviously references would be from Đilas [1] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ted71 (talkcontribs) 06:46, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dead source[edit]

Hello @ShanGuy37, I'm pinging you about this addition of yours. The specific problem is that http://www.rcmlibya.org/English/RCM%20(1).pdf is dead and all of its snapshots on Wayback Machine are too, as if it never were up. Were you able to access this source back in August 2020 when you added it, or did you carry it over from another article? Thanks in advance. –Vipz (talk) 15:33, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Turlejska[edit]

@Vipz:, @LeonChrisfield:, Turlejska was pulled from the Polish language article. Don't have access to the book in the libraries I have access to. I've reached out to Polish colleagues to see if they can find it. I'll see if I can pull and English language source from what I have access to, and if my Polish collegaues come up with nothing, I should be able to buy a copy of the book to be delivered. The timeline for this though is unlikely to be resolved until after the new year, apologies. -- Cdjp1 (talk) 11:41, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Vipz:, @LeonChrisfield:, I now have Turlejska's book, and I'm working through it with some Polish colleagues to provide full citations. -- Cdjp1 (talk) 21:37, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Vipz:, @LeonChrisfield: the Turlejska references have now all been split out and quotations provided. -- Cdjp1 (talk) 18:09, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]