Talk:Chicago III

Fair use rationale for Image:ChicagoIII.jpg[edit]

Image:ChicagoIII.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 20:35, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Feat?[edit]

Is releasing a bunch of double albums in a row really a accomplishing a feat? Seems a bit fanboyish to characterize it as such. It's notable, but most bands record the same amount of materieal for an album, but just choose not to release all of it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.14.124.47 (talk) 23:35, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

In addition, that they released double albums is peculiar to the limitations of the LP format. I haven't done the match, but it would surprise me if each of those albums later fit on single CD, and so would be without special significance. Nicmart (talk) 00:50, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

UK[edit]

Several of the group's album entries discuss the success, of lack of, in the United Kingdom. It isn't clear to me why the band's sales in the UK is of more importance than their sales in any other part of the world, or why it is important enough to deserve mention, except where sales were exceptional. Nicmart (talk) 00:48, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Carnegie Hall[edit]

Chicago was not the first rock band to play Carnegie Hall. The Beatles played at Carnegie in February of 1964, so there's at least one band that has them beat in this regard. ScatteredFrog — Preceding undated comment added 20:18, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Citation needed" -- Musical style, writing, composition[edit]

Are all the "citation needed" notations really needed in this section? Most of these are just basic observations. Ftg3plus4 (talk) 20:40, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]