Talk:Learning bayesian network structure

from VfD:

Article can be deleted because we already have an article Bayesian network. Andries 08:00, 24 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Delete once merged -- make sure all the good information that's not already in Bayesian network is merged in over there, then Delete. Jewbacca 08:10, Dec 24, 2004 (UTC)

Merge it(Delete once merged) . Take a decision only if participation on this poll exceeds 0.5% of active wikipedia population . (Active population are legitimate users that have cast at least one vote in the last 73 days). Keep this poll active for 23 days then archive it. If the participation threshold is bypassed, implement the best rated poll option regardless the percentage the first poll option got. (a minority percentage of less than 50% for the best rated poll option should be also valid). The decision should be valid for ever and should not be recalled. Iasson 08:19, 24 Dec 2004 (UTC)

- Merge and redirect. What the heck are you talking about, Iasson? hfool 17:11, 24 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  - He's joking about how Bayesian inference works. -- Jmabel | Talk 20:28, Dec 24, 2004 (UTC)

Yeah, merge and delete. - Vague | Rant 08:27, Dec 24, 2004 (UTC)
There is no reason to delete it if merged. A redirect preserves page history and will be useful if there are any outside links or bookmarks. (No vote) Kappa 08:30, 24 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Merge, clean up (internalize those links), put up redirect. Could merge with Bayesian network or more generally graphical model. Or do a three-way merge. --MarkSweep 12:43, 24 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Merge it. Wyss 00:52, 25 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Merge & redirect. Umm, User:Andries, kindly don't bite the newbie; I'd really like to see more stuff like this. Wile E. Heresiarch 06:27, 28 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Merge. Not sure a redirection is quite necessary. GRider\^talk 18:28, 29 Dec 2004 (UTC)

end moved discussion