Talk:Implosion (mechanical process)

by saying an implosion is an explosion from a circular motion. are you infact saying there can be no real implosions in the truer sense. (i also believe this article made little sense)

The vortex motion, which also causes a drop in temperature and an increase in density, is paramount for water to stay healthy and disease free.

Really? removed as nonsense - part of original article. -- Leonard G. 04:33, 29 Sep 2004 (UTC)

Removed some more nonsense:

One of the great researchers of implosion in nature was Viktor Schauberger (1885-1958).

On the Web I can only find pseudoscientific information on Schauberger. --RW 11:36, 10 September 2005 (UTC)

What is this all about? It doesn't make any sense to me (but I'm not an expert in this field!): These spherical high explosive charges form a spherical assembly of multiple high explosive charges. When a spherical assembly of multiple high explosive charges is used this is called a segmented design. 193.60.63.224 09:17, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

This article needs to be cleaned up or organized. It seems to waver back and forth between building implosions (which probably should be a different article), cavitation and thermonuclear devices. It doesn't seem to distinguish implosions created by greater explosions and implosions caused by a return to equilibrium. It also doesn't mention the most fantastic kind of implosion, the supernova. --kwg06516 13:38, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

Building demolition

In common usage, building implosion is probably more widely used than the nuclear physics definition. If anybody is up to it a Implosion (buildings) article is probably apt. Americasroof 14:53, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

In case you haven't noticed I created a implosion disambiguation page. Americasroof 01:39, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

This article currently implies that a building implosion is "erroneously described as an implosion."

However, it seems to me that a building implosion meets every point of the definition at the top of the article:

"Implosion is a process in which objects are destroyed by collapsing on themselves. ... implosion concentrates matter and energy.

A building implosion does exactly that, and so is correctly described as a kind of implosion, right? --68.0.124.33 (talk) 04:39, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

I guess the best way to handle this would be to look up a reference and update the article accordingly. —Quibik (talk) 09:52, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

Big Bang implosion before explosion

theory: The accelerating Universal expansion when it will become superluminal it will reach the maximum quantum decoherence, so any more expansion will not be able to be expressed, and all that energy will spontaneously produce huge amounts of energy. Energy becomes mass via the field interactions, and all that mass will collapse and get compressed to the ultimate level or permitted degeneracy, and it will bounce then off and explode. The Universal energic homogeneity exist because: 1. at some point maximum quantum decoherence was met (semi-perfect defaulting), 2. before the system bounces adiabatically the energy has some time to become semi-homogenious. This mechanism isn't perfect so one small percentage of the perceived non-homogeneity is decoherence shadows from previous universes.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Implosion (mechanical process). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060907121659/http://ludwieg.caltech.edu/N_Ponchaut_Thesis.pdf to http://ludwieg.caltech.edu/N_Ponchaut_Thesis.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:59, 12 November 2017 (UTC)