Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Salafi/Temp

Salafi/Temp

Salafi/Temp was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was delete.

Was listed for speedy deletion but I faily to see how it meets the criteria, other than being a temp page. -- Graham ☺ | Talk 02:55, 24 Dec 2004 (UTC)

So would you mind giving your reason for deleting it? Dr Zen 04:23, 24 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Sorry about that, it was because it seemed rather POV and unencyclopedic as it stood, and I couldn't see the point of redirecting a temp page. -- Graham ☺ | Talk 04:11, 27 Dec 2004 (UTC)

• There's a perfectly reasonable article at Salafi. This one's POV and possibly offensive, see first line. Delete. Anything useful can be written at the correct article. Weren't temps meant to rewrite copyvios? Mgm|^(talk) 09:00, Dec 24, 2004 (UTC)
• Delete, almost a speedy, PoV rant, poof. Wyss 01:06, 25 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• Delete, POV, no useful information, and no reason for this to exist apart from Salafi. Rhymeswithgod 09:08, 25 Dec 2004 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.