Talk:Cardinal

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
WikiProject iconDisambiguation
WikiProject iconThis disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.

Old stuff[edit]

How is the Cessna a sub-heading of the bird? SkyDot 19:13, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  • The consistency of the existence of strongly inaccessible cardinals can not be proved under ZFC.
    • Is that correct? I thought the existence of strongly inaccessible cardinals can (provably) not be proved, while it is open whether their non-existence can be proved. In other words, "the consistency of the existence of strongly inaccessible cardinals" has not yet been proved while the consistency of their non-existence has been proved.
Yes, your version is correct. That existence of inacc. cardinals cannot be proved is a direct consequence of the 2nd incompleteness theorem (one observes that the set of all sets with rank less than that of an inacc. cardinal form a model of ZFC). Incidentally, wouldn't it be better to have the main article at Cardinal number? "Cardinal" has a pretty well-defined religious meaning as well, and "cardinal number" is not outdated.
not to mention the bird. And the baseball team.--MichaelTinkler
Ok, I'm convinced. Cardinal number it is. --AxelBoldt
As this refers to a subdivision/less obvious definition of the term, could it be emphasised that it is the number that is being referred to, not a religious person being away from their phone (g). Jackiespeel 18:08, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Deleting Mike Cline Contributions[edit]

I am deleting or reverting any contributions I have previously made to this article for the following reason. I work for a company that practices and teaches Strategic Planning methodologies thus making my contribution to any article related to Strategy topics a conflict of interest an in violation of Wikipedia Conflict of Interest guidelines WP:COI --Mike Cline 13:25, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cardinal is also a popular swiss beer brand, should I add it?

Revert[edit]

Anon. IP removed a link with no explanation. I reverted. -- SECisek 01:25, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move[edit]

CardinalCardinal (disambiguation) — We should really give the main article to what is now Cardinal (Catholicism). A look at "what links here" shows this is overwhemingly the main use involved. The mathmatical use is at Cardinal number, & if there were a predominant sports team using the term they could have "Cardinals" (I don't have a view on that). Few people can really link to "Cardinal" when they mean "cardinal bird", and the other uses are minor. This page should herefore become "Cardinal (disambiguation)" —Johnbod 20:05, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please centralize voting and discussion at the survey at Talk:Cardinal_(Catholicism)#Requested_move Johnbod 23:37, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A move proposal for this page was listed at Wikipedia:Requested moves, but there was no consensus found for the move. Dekimasuよ! 00:34, 7 December 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Passenger Train Entry[edit]

The passenger train entry reads “Cardinal (passenger train), an Amtrak route connecting Chicago with New York via Cincinnati and Washington” -- it mentions Cincinnati and Washington to avoid confusion with Amtrak’s other Chicago-New York routes:

  • Lake Shore Limited (18h 45m)
  • Pennsylvanian and Capitol Limited (19h)
  • Regional Service and Capitol Limited (21h)

For reference purposes, note that the Cardinal service is 28h 50m. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.205.54.39 (talk) 13:15, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Cardinal (Catholic Church) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 19:46, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]