Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dawg (0th nomination)

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was - Delete

Dawg[edit]

  • Delete: It's slang, and slang doesn't belong on Wikipedia.
    • Was nominated by someone without an account, so their vote doesn't count. --Improv 17:09, 19 Nov 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete. Slang dicdef. --Improv 17:06, 19 Nov 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete. Slang, Wikipedia is not a dictionary. Metro3947
  • Delete: Slang dictdef, and it should be referring to the University of Georgia football team, anyway. Geogre 19:49, 19 Nov 2004 (UTC)
  • Maybe merge with a page on urban slang, but delete this; it does not deserve its own page... and it is a dictdef. --Idont Havaname 02:01, 20 Nov 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete DCEdwards1966 03:01, Nov 20, 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete. --*drew 07:33, 21 Nov 2004 (UTC)
  • Extremely delete. Andre (talk) 23:51, Nov 21, 2004 (UTC)
  • Transwiki and delete redirect to dog. Very short merge may be appropriate. We should at least mention "dawg" on dog. anthony 警告 02:18, 22 Nov 2004 (UTC)
  • Abstain Simply being slang is not enough reason to delete. Homie and Dude, along with the articles under Category:Slang have been kept. — J3ff 04:57, 22 Nov 2004 (UTC)
    • True, but the thing is this isn't really slang so much as an alternate spelling/pronounciation of the same word. In this sense I suppose a redirect would be appropriate, but I don't think we should have a full article on it. Of course we have an article on nucular, but I think that one should be transwikied, merged (whatever is encyclopedic which is little), and redirected as well. In fact, I'm going to mention this on Talk:Nucular right now. anthony 警告 13:18, 22 Nov 2004 (UTC)
  • I've added some new information to the article. Before the additions my opinion would have been a definate delete, and even with my additions my opinion wavers between a very weak keep to a very weak delete. [[User:GK|gK ¿?]] 15:39, 22 Nov 2004 (UTC)
  • Keep or redirect. --Dittaeva 20:46, 23 Nov 2004 (UTC)
  • Dewete' - Ta bu shi da yu 03:01, 24 Nov 2004 (UTC)
  • Keep or redirect. --Rieg 21:56, 27 Nov 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete slang dicdef and hardly notable ike9898 21:42, Nov 29, 2004 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Dawg_(0th_nomination)&oldid=1104605706"