User talk:Duca~enwiki

Salut

1. Lasa nationalitatzile in pace, te rog, ce te-ai legat de ele?!

2. Alege cuvintele care le utilizezi in paginile wiki. Daca scrii maturi in rusa, pai macar pe acelea scrie-le corect. Doamane, multa lume mai e...

serhio 06:24, 29 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you continually adding an infobox to Tiraspol when it contains no information? I have no objection to adding an infobox to the article if it contains information, but the entire box is filled with question marks and blank spaces. Ambi 15:27, 30 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

so called "moldovan" language and Romanian[edit]

Salut Duca! Maybe you will like to check the recent dispute regarding to the Moldovan_language and take some support actions. Your help is wellcomed. There is no unitary Moldovan language. It seems that user Node deletes systematic an important part of the text. Plus, you may suppor the action to file a vandalism report as proposal of Dpotop [[1]]. Stay sharp.Impreuna suntem o forta. Bonaparte talk & contribs

You may also check this out Transnistria. Bonaparte talk & contribs

Alexander for Admin[edit]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship/Alexander_007 ,

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship#Alexander_007 . I've nominated User:Alexander_007 as admin. Let's vote for him! -- Bonaparte talk & contribs 14:39, 4 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Duca is back![edit]

Just great! You're the man! -- Bonaparte talk 06:52, 9 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Moldovan[edit]

Your edits to Moldovan language are considered vandalism. If you do not agree with an article, post civil comments on the talk page. If you continue to vandalise, you will be blocked. --Gareth Hughes 22:53, 9 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits and comments to Chernivtsi Oblast[edit]

Dear Duca, I find your recents changes to that page unacceptable in terms of both the fantastic POV (IMHO) you're pushing and the editing way you use. Please refrain from such actions in future, whatever disagreements would appear between us.

You know, we're fighting the Russian imperial propaganda on the UA pages. I thought Romania-concerned editors were more civil and co-operative than Muscovy ones - as being more "Western" and "European". Was I wrong? Do they match the portrait in all those pejorative anecdotes that I know about Moldovans :) ?

Also, you called Irpen a member of a shovinist ukranian nationalists fascist crew. Believe me he's not :)). May be I am, but you won't notice it from my edits. I wouldn't be insulted if you called me that, but many people would. So I suggest you to stop this inflammatory name-calling anywhere on Wiki pages. Let me remind you of the definition and respective penalties that may result from such an approach. Best wishes, Ukrained 23:22, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ducă, văzui eu că ai început a te lua la harţă cu rutenii într-un spirit care nu are nici un loc pe wikipedia. Te rog pe viitor să încerci să te controlezi căci ceea ce faci mai mult dăunează cauzei româneşti decât ajută. Încearcă să fi mai rezervat şi mai calm pe viitor. Mulţumesc. Constantzeanu 02:38, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Abuse of WP:RFCU[edit]

Please do not make bad faith requests for CheckUser. CheckUser requests are timeconsuming to process; dealing with clearly malicious requests such as yours waste my time and make me cranky. Kelly Martin (talk) 03:14, 23 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Warning[edit]

Please cease immediately you dissemination of discord within wikipedia, otherwise you will be blocked indefinitely. mikka (t) 19:43, 27 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Warning (Romanian)[edit]

Template'ul cu desmembrarea Ucrainiei ofensează utilizatorii ucrainieni şi nu numai, aduce şi ruşine noua, utilizatorii români de pe wikipedia. Te rog neapărat să ştergi acest format numaidecât. Constantzeanu 19:15, 28 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your account will be renamed[edit]

Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Duca. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Duca~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours,
Keegan Peterzell
Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation

23:35, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed[edit]

This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: Special:GlobalRenameRequest. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk)

12:21, 22 April 2015 (UTC)