Talk:Hafnium

Hafnium has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
November 17, 2008	Good article nominee	Listed
March 30, 2011	Good topic candidate	Promoted
May 16, 2022	Good topic removal candidate	Demoted

Current status: Good article

Archives

Archive 1

This page has archives. Sections older than 730 days may be automatically archived by when more than 4 sections are present.

Untitled[edit]

Article changed over to new Wikipedia:WikiProject Elements format by maveric149 and Dwmyers. Elementbox converted 10:58, 14 July 2005 by Femto (previous revision was that of 16:28, 10 July 2005).

Information Sources[edit]

Some of the text in this entry was rewritten from Los Alamos National Laboratory - Hafnium. Additional text was taken directly from, from the Elements database 20001107 (via dict.org), and WordNet (r) 1.7 (via dict.org). Data for the table was obtained from the sources listed on the subject page and Wikipedia:WikiProject Elements but was reformatted and converted into SI units.

Jargonium[edit]

Search for jargonium redirects to the hafnium article. Yet there is no mention of this supposedly new chemical element found by Henry Clifton Sorby [neither is in the article of him). [[1]][[2]] — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2003:E5:1737:DB34:6D08:8060:96A4:65B3 (talk) 10:19, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hacker group called Hafnium[edit]

I tried to add:

{{distinguish|Hafnium (group)}}, which was blamed for the 2021 Microsoft Exchange Server data breach.

However, visual editor and old school editing would not format well. Please add. Geraldshields11 (talk) 21:38, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I got it done whit a different tag. Geraldshields11 (talk) 21:43, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]