Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William Connolley
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep. Deathphoenix 08:00, 27 Feb 2005 (UTC)
William Connolley[edit]
Vanity? Close to 500 hits on google, most of which are relevant. [1] GRider\talk 23:48, 14 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Not created by the subject, though obviously with the knowledge that he was reading... Delete for the moment - notability doesn't seem to have been established. Very willing to reconsider if article establishes why he is notable in the field of climate modelling/the formation of the "IPCC Consensus"/something else...
- Keep, cleanup and expand. A published climate modellist and research, [2]. Megan1967 04:11, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Keep, I'll go with Megan1967's take. Wyss 19:15, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Comment: I didn't create this article. I don't have a strong opinion as to whether it should stay or not William M. Connolley 09:42, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC).
- Keep, looks notable. JamesBurns 10:48, 26 Feb 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.