Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Metocean

Neologism. Not even a dictdef. RickK 20:17, Aug 12, 2004 (UTC)

• 14,700 Google hits. Pretty successfull neologism. Conditional keep. Some more content is needed. -- Pjacobi 21:10, 12 Aug 2004 (UTC)

• Agreed, weak keep. -Sean Curtin 22:05, 12 Aug 2004 (UTC)

• Delete. While it may be used enough to be appropriate for a dictionary, this term is no more than the sum of meteorology and oceanography, which are properly in their own separate and full articles, and does not belong in an encyclopedia. - Centrx 02:48, 13 Aug 2004 (UTC)

• Delete: I think this is, here, useless. The most we can do, if no one gives us context, is send it to Wiktionary. Geogre 13:14, 13 Aug 2004 (UTC)
• Delete dicdef. -- Cyrius|✎ 05:50, 16 Aug 2004 (UTC)