Talk:MPICH

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software (assessed as Low-importance).

Linux Low‑importance

	Linux portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linux, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Linux on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinuxWikipedia:WikiProject LinuxTemplate:WikiProject LinuxLinux articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

MPICH and MPICH2 should be merged. MPICH2 evolved into MPICH 3.0 so the name MPICH2 is largely a historical artifact at this point.

thread safe?[edit]

So, is MPICH2 thread safe? Can I call send & recv from different threads? Google only knows that in 2005, this was not the case (it was THREAD_FUNNELLD) but now that its 2012... linas (talk) 01:23, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. MPICH2 is thread-safe. You can run a simple test to confirm this.

changing the channel[edit]

It is not clear what is meant by the term 'channel' in the discussion of MPICH. I'm sure it has some technical meaning which could be elaborated on to the benefit of the article. Does it mean like a channel of distribution of MPICH or is it some other more technical reference? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 132.45.121.6 (talk) 14:35, 9 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on MPICH. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061106152359/http://www.mpi-forum.org/docs/docs.html to http://www.mpi-forum.org/docs/docs.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:02, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]