Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crypt Fiend

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was merge and redirect. Mackensen (talk) 22:58, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Crypt Fiend[edit]

Wikipedia is not a game guide, for individual units in games. Talrias (t | e | c) 23:36, 30 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The user who created the article, ScrewedThePooch (talk · contribs), is removing the VfD tag from this article. Talrias (t | e | c) 23:54, 30 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per Talrias, but without prejudice to ScrewedThePooch in rgds Do Not Bite The N00bs. Marblespire 00:07, 31 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, delete. My comment was not meant as a slight on User:ScrewedThePooch, just to ensure that the VfD notice remains in place. :) Talrias (t | e | c) 00:13, 31 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Crypt Fiends are also an undead creature from D&D, but they still aren't notable. -Sean Curtin 03:34, May 31, 2005 (UTC)
Delete. Neither units from Warcraft III nor monsters that appear only in supplementary Monster Manuals are encyclopedic. A Man In Black 05:13, 31 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - you're right, they're not particularly notable, but plenty of Wikipedia articles detail things which dont seem all that notable - I personally couldn't care less about all the pointless Pokemon pages. Article is a well written stub, could be expanded in future. Not encyclopedic in the traditional sense, maybe, but I see no reason to delete. UkPaolo 11:58, 31 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keeping the Pokemon as individual articles is quite controversial; take a look at Wikipedia:Poképrosal if you want to know more. A Man In Black 00:42, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Merge somewhere, and fix capitalization. R adiant _* 13:27, May 31, 2005 (UTC)
Merge content to Undead Scourge; the D&D crypt fiend probably doesn't deserve its own page, either. Nateji77 13:56, 31 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Merge per Nateji77 — RJH 19:40, 31 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to either Undead Scourge or Nerubian ScrewedThePooch
Delete - not notable A curate's egg 19:27, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Merge to Undead Scourge. JamesBurns 09:35, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.