Talk:Delivering Security in a Changing World

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

I'm not sure about the following:

'Overall cuts will see personnel levels drop from 108,500 to 102,000 - this compares to a total strength of 255,000 prior to the 1993 Options for Change cuts.'

Is this a confusion between current British Army strength (before/after former) and overall armed services 1993 strength (latter)?

I can't find an accurate, modern overall figure anywhere. :Clue

Currently deleted 'overall strength' comment --Clue 04:22, 2 Sep 2004 (UTC)


These look like Army-only numbers.

FYI, the total strengths of the UK Armed Forces at 1st April 2000 were: - Royal Navy 42,900 (including 5,900 Royal Marines) - Army 110,100 - RAF 54,700 for a total of 207,700 regular personnel.

The overall Defence total, including civilians and locally engaged personal, and possibly including reservists, was 349,800 at that date, including 115,100 civilians. For comparison, the overall Defence total ten years earlier (1990) was 487,000. --Vvmodel (talk) 14:39, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Delivering Security in a Changing World. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 09:21, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]