Talk:Hunminjeongeum Haerye

Korea Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Writing systems Mid‑importance

	Writing portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Writing systems, a WikiProject interested in improving the encyclopaedic coverage and content of articles relating to writing systems on Wikipedia. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project’s talk page.Writing systemsWikipedia:WikiProject Writing systemsTemplate:WikiProject Writing systemsWriting system articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

Hello, I am from Korea, but this is strange:

The Haerye is Korean national treasure number 432.

Above was introduced in 2003-09-14 edit. I can confirm that there is no such thing as Korean national treasure no. 432. In fact the last number of the national treasure list is currently at 307. (No. 307 was assigned 2004-09-02. I read it on the newspaper.)

Haerye copy is No. 70, as far as I can tell. Current Wikipedia articles on Hunmin Jeongeum copies are seriously confused. There are actually 3 versions we are talking about:

1) Ye-eui copy. (Sample and Signification) 2) Eon-hae copy. (Hangul annotation) 3) Hae-rye copy. (Explanation with examples)

1) is the one recorded in the Annals. 2) is mostly a translation of 1), although there are differences. 3) is much longer, and includes 1) at the beginning.

(By the way, "The Sejong Chronicles" reference is a crap. It is just a part of Annals of Joseon Dynasty.)

There are 4 copies of 2). There are only 1 copy of 3).

-- Anon

Dear Anon from Korea, since it is so "strange", then please be bold and simply improve/correct this "crap". Wiki means those "seriously confused" articles gets corrected. Your insights will be appreciated more that way. --Menchi 21:30, 17 Sep 2004 (UTC)

Different image?[edit]

I think Image:Hunmin jeong-eum.jpg is obviously

not: "Hunmin Jeongeum Haerye"; (訓民正音解例 or 解例本; [1], [2])
but: "Hunmin Jeongeum Eonhae"; (訓民正音諺解 or 諺解本; [3]; w:ko:훈민정음 언해, s:ko:훈민정음언해)

mainly because of its hangulfulness. :) Mulukhiyya (talk) 11:30, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You're absolutely right. --Kjoonlee 23:22, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hunminjeongeum Haerye. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101231071307/http://ling.kgw.tu-berlin.de/Hunminjongum/hun/p01.htm to http://ling.kgw.tu-berlin.de/Hunminjongum/hun/p01.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:25, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]