Talk:Mungu ibariki Afrika

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Songs

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Africa: Tanzania High‑importance

	Africa portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Tanzania portal This article is supported by WikiProject Tanzania (assessed as High-importance).

A fact from Mungu ibariki Afrika appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 24 June 2014 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that over 120 Jehovah's Witnesses objected to singing "God bless Africa" because they believed it suggests obeisance to the flag of Tanzania over God?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2014/June. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Mungu ibariki Afrika.

Wikipedia

Assessment Comments[edit]

Since this is a national anthem and contains the words, I assess it start. More can be added concerning the selection and usage of this anthem.Gallador (talk) 14:15, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The audio here in incorrect. This is the national anthem of South Africa which includes the second half of Die Stem!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.185.229.58 (talk) 22:25, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

removed Esperranto translation

Dio benu Afrikon
kaj gxiajn estraranojn
Sagxo, Unueco kaj
Paco, tiuj estas niaj sxildoj:
Afriko kaj gxiaj homoj.

KORUSO:
Benu Afrikon
Benu Afrikon
Benu nin, afrikajn infanojn.

Dio benu Tanzanujon
Gardu liberon kaj unuecon
de gxiaj virinoj, viroj kaj infanoj
Dio benu Tanzanujon kaj gxiajn homojn.

KORUSO:
Benu Afrikon
Benu Afrikon
Benu nin, afrikajn infanojn.

Breaking up "This Translation"[edit]

It seems the "This Translation" section can be broken up into a history and controversies section. -- Sputink (talk) 20:36, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Mungu ibariki Afrika. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:46, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]