Talk:Académica de Coimbra (football)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Supporters[edit]

isnt Boavista the Fourth in number of supporters? - --Cyprus2k1 12:29, 8 Jun 2004 (UTC)

  • it isn't - outside the big games it's rare the Bessa has an attendance over 10k, but it's quite disputable that Académica claims the 4th spot. While it is indeed a very respected side nationwide, most of it's fanbase only has Académica as the "second team", after Benfica, Porto or Sporting (for academic reasons, as pointed in the article). V.Setúbal or V.Guimarães probably top Académica, but even that would be hard to prove.

I'll try to NPOV the article a bit and correct some info when I'm in better shape. Added to "watch" for now. WolfenSilva 12:34, 23 Jul 2004 (UTC)

Current Squad nationalities at WikiProject Football[edit]

I have raised the nationality listings of the Current Squad section at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football#Nationality of players in Current Squad sections. AecisBrievenbus 23:12, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was No consensus for a move. --Philip Baird Shearer (talk) 11:15, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Associação Académica de Coimbra - O.A.F. → Académica de Coimbra → Académica de Coimbra OAF per WP:Common name. Sebisthlm (talk) 14:10, 16 February 2008 (UTC).[reply]

Amendment[edit]

The request has been amended. Naming the football club Académica de Coimbra may infringe on the other articles on the University of Coimbra student organization and its sports departments. Personally I think the football club would be best suited changing name according to the first move request with Associação Académica de Coimbra moving to Coimbra's Academic Association (there is no reason why that article's name should be in portuguese on English Wikipedia (see for example Uppsala Student Union). However, a mass move operation involving all articles linked to Associação Académica de Coimbra is probably unrealistic, hence the amendment of the move request. Sebisthlm (talk) 08:36, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

New Survey[edit]

Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.
  • Comment It seems to me that the proposed move to Académica de Coimbra OAF is unnecessary. Académica de Coimbra OAF already redirects here. However, it may be a better version according to general guidelines on naming conventions, so I don't oppose. Yodaki (talk) 10:34, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - the point is that the actual title is the one used in categories and lists. Sebisthlm (talk) 11:59, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose if this is an Encyclopedia, whe should try to use / create the information correct, so if it doesn't make sense to change it...Aritajustino (talk) 12:07, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: Again, please read WP:Common name. Article names should basically be the name by wich the subject is most commonly known, not necessarily the full official or scientific name. In this case the title is too long. Also, remember that this is the English Wikipedia. Sebisthlm (talk) 12:24, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Old Survey[edit]

  • Comment: The (professional) football club is by far the best known of the sports departments. If you look at the articles on the other departments, they all consist of three or four sentences. Sebisthlm (talk) 08:36, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: Your suggestion is still too long. My amended suggestion make more sense. Sebisthlm (talk) 08:36, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: Please read WP:Common name. Article names should basically be the name by wich the subject is most commonly known, not necessarily the full official or scientific name. In this case the title is too long. Sebisthlm (talk) 08:36, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • This survey is closed since the move request has been amended.

Discussion[edit]

Any additional comments:
  • In my opinion, the proposed move to Académica de Coimbra OAF is unnecessary. Académica de Coimbra OAF already redirects here. Yodaki (talk) 09:39, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Associação Académica de Coimbra – O.A.F.. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:52, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Associação Académica de Coimbra – O.A.F.. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:22, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 19:53, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 20 October 2022[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Page moved to "Académica de Coimbra (football)" per the RM discussion. (closed by non-admin page mover) Judekkan (talk) 18:02, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Associação Académica de Coimbra – O.A.F. → Académica – OAF – The current page name is ridiculously long and very rarely used. The club iteself is usually just known as "Académica". I reckon Académica – OAF is a good option, since it's used in their Twitter, official website, Instagram, and TikTok Ortizesp (talk) 16:27, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 09:53, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Académica_de_Coimbra_(football)&oldid=1197892347"