This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Islam-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslamWikipedia:WikiProject IslamTemplate:WikiProject IslamIslam-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LiteratureWikipedia:WikiProject LiteratureTemplate:WikiProject LiteratureLiterature articles
Good start, IFaqeer! Zora 17:43, 18 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Can't take all credit; the thinking behind it came from an outline Grenavitar (talk • contribs) had on his (her?) page as a To Do item for a while. I took that and expanded it.—iFaqeer(Talk to me!) 19:41, May 18, 2005 (UTC)
NIce work guys . but Gospel of Barnabas ?? I know its relevence with islamic view of Jesus ... but then ... dont U think its not a part of Islamic texts Farhansher 21:10, 27 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
I admit I know nothing of the text, but on the wiki page for Gospel of Barnabas it seems to imply, under the Islamic perspective section, that some scholars deem it authentic. Perhaps apocrypha is not the best title. Am I misunderstanding the page's explanation? freestylefrappe 00:35, 27 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
