User talk:Rdsmith4

Archives: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10

Leave me a message on this page. If it's urgent or private, send an e-mail instead.

I award you the **Photographer's barnstar** for your Featured Pictures and collection of F1 portraits. — Solipsist 16:26, 25 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome back![edit]

Welcome back Rdsmith4, long time no see! If you are in need of some of the "lesser" rights related tools feel free to drop me a note - or you can go visit WP:PERM to see what's changed. Happy editing, — xaosflux ^Talk 02:53, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks mate! Hope you've been well. Gosh, the permissions system is quite a bit more fine-grained than I recall. Well, not having them all is already making me itchy, but I think I'll make do for now. :-) Dan 05:20, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A belated (so belated you seem to have gone again) welcome back from me. --Dweller (talk) Become old fashioned! 14:44, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Metric football listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Metric football. Since you had some involvement with the Metric football redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. BDD (talk) 21:13, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Timeline rulers of Monaco[edit]

Template:Timeline rulers of Monaco has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 22:04, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Princess Michael[edit]

The article Princess Michael has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Princess Michael of Kent is clearly wp:primary. Delete per WP:2DABS.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Nevé –selbert 18:01, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Rdsmith4. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Timeline Lords of Monaco[edit]

Template:Timeline Lords of Monaco has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 16:22, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:F1 listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Wikipedia:F1. Since you had some involvement with the Wikipedia:F1 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. ToThAc (talk) 03:07, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Precious[edit]

"I remain entirely attached to the project"

Thank you for quality articles such as Max Mosley, for beginning articles such as Montserrat Caballé and Circuit de Barcelona-Catalunya, fo categories such as Formula One Grands Prix, for service from 2004, including later admin and bureaucrat service, for "I remain entirely attached to the project and committed to its aims", - Dan, repeating (24 October 2008): you are an awesome Wikipedian!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 18:49, 6 October 2018 (UTC) [reply]

and 10 years ago today --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:23, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

... and a year ago, you were recipient no. 2238 of Precious, a prize of QAI! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:29, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Rdsmith4. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Cromwell's listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Cromwell's. Since you had some involvement with the Cromwell's redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. — the Man in Question (in question) 20:56, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Newton's listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Newton's. Since you had some involvement with the Newton's redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. — the Man in Question (in question) 21:00, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"King Henry VI" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect King Henry VI. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 July 4#King Henry VI until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Certes (talk) 12:16, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"King Henry VII" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect King Henry VII. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 July 4#King Henry VII until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Certes (talk) 12:16, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Precious anniversary[edit]

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:45, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Ñoldorin" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Ñoldorin. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 February 16#Ñoldorin until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Hildeoc (talk) 21:32, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been removed from Wikipedia:Local Embassy due to inactivity[edit]

Hi Rdsmith4! You're receiving this notification because you were previously listed at Wikipedia:Local Embassy, but you haven't made any edits to the English Wikipedia in over 6 months.

Because of your inactivity, you have been removed from the list. If you would like to resubscribe, you can do so at any time by visiting Wikipedia:Local Embassy.

Thank you! Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:00, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Precious anniversary[edit]

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:04, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Ways and Means Committee" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Ways and Means Committee. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 October 18#Ways and Means Committee until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. MB 18:33, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Blue(Pokémon)" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

The redirect Blue(Pokémon) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 September 1 § Blue(Pokémon) until a consensus is reached. QuicoleJR (talk) 19:47, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Namibian (disambiguation)[edit]

The article Namibian (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Invalid and unnecessary disambiguation page containing the primary topic and only one other topic.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:02, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]