Talk:90125

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 90125 article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Albums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Progressive Rock Start‑class Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Progressive Rock, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Progressive rock on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Progressive RockWikipedia:WikiProject Progressive RockTemplate:WikiProject Progressive RockProgressive rock articles
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

With current Wikipedia policy, this page should be reserved for an article on 90125 A.D. that will be created 88121 years from now. I shall begin the move! - Woodrow 02:51, 27 Mar 2004 (UTC)

Back to 90125 (album)[edit]

This page really needs to be where it belongs. All digit sequences are years, even some very long ones. (Note the talk page is already where it should be). Rich Farmbrough, 12:31 9 October 2006 (GMT).

According to Naming conventions (numbers and dates), "Nonetheless some numbers above a normal date range have another topic than a year, e.g. 4711." The year 90125 is considerably farther in the future than 4711, so I don't think this is much of an issue. Personally, I am indifferent about which title the page should occupy. Khatru2 22:06, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:12 inches.jpg[edit]

Image:12 inches.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 05:19, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:90125/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Article requirements:

Y A relatively complete infobox
Y Cover art in the infobox
Y A lead section giving an overview of the album
Y At least one section of informative prose other than lead
Y A track listing, containing track lengths & composers

A list of personnel (band members, guest musicians and technical)

Categorisation at least by artist and year

Substituted at 21:32, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

Original title[edit]

"Its number was 90104 at first, but an error in the system led to its change to 90125. “It was going to be called 90124,” sleeve designer Garry Mouat explained to Classic Rock."

90104? Or 90124?