Talk:Mohammad Beheshti

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Mid-importance).

Iran Low‑importance

	Iran portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Iran, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles related to Iran on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please join the project where you can contribute to the discussions and help with our open tasks.IranWikipedia:WikiProject IranTemplate:WikiProject IranIran articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

clerical title should be included, just like with Cardinals (Thomas Cardinal Wolsey). Gryffindor 19:02, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, that is an accusation which should have some back up, surely ? Otherwise it will just be conspiracy theory and gossip. Who felt it was Rafsanjani and who published it ? Was there evidence ? Refdoc 22:56, 23 Jul 2004 (UTC)

Well, it is conspiracy theory and gossip, in my belief. But I thought that it's worth a mention, because it's very very popular here in Iran. I'm sure no investigation in that direction would have been possible, because of the then situation of affairs (a thorough investigation is still impossible even for simpler cases like that of Zahra Kazemi or the student protests of 1999). As for who published it, I'm sure many Iranian journalist writing from out of the country wrote about that, but they couldn't be trusted either, because they usually write on every rumor. Feel free to reword. Roozbeh 23:17, 23 Jul 2004 (UTC)

Fair enough, what would be Iranian politics without conspiracy theories? ;-) But seriously, we include this here and yet I keep argueing on the Cpt Will Roger's article against K1's conspiracy theories. Hardly consistent. What would be in your view a good threshold for including conspiracy theories and gossip in encyclopaedic articles ? Refdoc 00:54, 24 Jul 2004 (UTC)

Being very popular? Roozbeh 02:29, 24 Jul 2004 (UTC)

User 60.48.181.227 you have added this:

"He also received Electrical engineering PHD from sorbonne university through internet (Cyber degree)."

where/what is your source for this?Your own imagination? He died in 1981. How did an akhoond have access to 'internets' in 1970s?! —Preceding unsigned comment added by PrivateCitizen999999999 (talk • contribs) 10:20, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

He recived PHD through internet?![edit]

User 60.48.181.227 you have added this:

"He also received Electrical engineering PHD from sorbonne university through internet (Cyber degree)."

where/what is your source for this?Your own imagination? He died in 1981. How did an akhoond have access to 'internets' in 1970s?!PrivateCitizen (talk) 10:23, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sources needed[edit]

There are a number of assertions of Beheshti's position which require sources. Additionally, some of the sections require improved structure, particularly 'epistemology' and 'anthropology'. Potentially it is worth deleting and re-starting the 'anthropology' section as it relates more to theology - discussion of the existence or otherwise of the human soul is not relevant to anthropology. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ConstitutionalLawyer (talk • contribs) 21:12, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mohammad Beheshti. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090628075550/http://www.shahsawandi.com/index.php?option=com_zoom&Itemid=39&page=view&catid=8&PageNo=1&key=16&hit=1 to http://www.shahsawandi.com/index.php?option=com_zoom&Itemid=39&page=view&catid=8&PageNo=1&key=16&hit=1

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:56, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]