Talk:Chongjin

Korea High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject North Korea.

Cities

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

Untitled[edit]

Isn't the Korea Bay on the Yellow Sea side of Korea? Not the Sea of Japan (EAst Sea) side? Are there two Korea Bays? I don't have time right now, but later tonight I will look into this a little closer. Masterhatch

Right you are. See Korea Bay. I pulled it out of the article. -- Visviva 10:23, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)

What would happen if an inhabitant of Chongjin ran into the Russian consulate so that he could eat and hopefully migrate to Russia? Embassy grounds are technically their country's own soil, so they'd be out of the DPRK's jurisdiction. --Shultz 15:47, 13 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, but there's no reason why the Russian consulate would have to take them. They'd be turned away. --Reuben 09:06, 26 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

So Russia is not keen on accepting political and economic refugees? They're a democracy now, so why don't they? --Shultz 10:42, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

When I think of Chongjin, why does the Pink Panther theme song start to play in my head, and only goes away as soon as I don't think of Chongjin anymore? Maybe it should become the "Municipal Anthem" as soon as Reunification occurs. --Shultz 10:42, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

File:Chongjin-center-2.jpg Nominated for Deletion[edit]

An image used in this article, File:Chongjin-center-2.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests August 2011

What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 18:27, 17 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Chinese inspired redevelopment[edit]

I'm not sure if there ARE any other sources for this, but it looks like there is a massive and almost certainly notable chinese style megacity from scratch project going on here as per this and this. The website is paywalled, but you should be able to read these if you haven't yet reached the monthly limit of 4 free articles. The only reason I didn't make a section myself in the article was because i'm not sure if this can be considered a reliable source. The actual satelite photos are compelling, though... --Free Wales Now! what did I screw up? 14:52, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Chongjin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061102025933/http://nk.chosun.com/map/map.html?ACT=geo_03 to http://nk.chosun.com/map/map.html?ACT=geo_03

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:41, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]