Talk:Ostwind

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Ostwind article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Germany Low‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Land vehicles / Technology / Weaponry / European / German / World War II Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military land vehicles task force
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force
	European military history task force
	German military history task force
	World War II task force

Why call it "Ostwind (tank)" instead of just "Ostwind"? I think this is the primary Ostwind english readers would look up.

I also removed the note of discrepency. Considering that it's only off by one, and therefore more accurate then pretty much every other figure we have, I don't think it's really all that relevant. Oberiko 22:35, 12 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

I have no objections to just calling it "Ostwind"...and the difference of one tank is indeed small enogh to let it slip by :p Ferkelparade 13:34, 13 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

I am under the impression that this imagecould be considered fair use; but I'm a n00b to edits and not really sure how to go about it all, especially with regards to images. It comes from this site which also has other old pictures of several WWII armor which may be of use. ~Springfinger 21:00 19 Sept 2006