Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chronolatry

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. – ABCD 22:36, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Chronolatry

Neologism dic def of word not in use--hits from only 5 websites, one of which is a non-compliant Wikipedia mirror. Niteowlneils 19:49, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)

• Delete neologism. --InShaneee 21:39, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete neologism. —Seselwa 01:35, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, neologism. Megan1967 06:17, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, neologism. Chronolatry, a word supposedly coined . These first 5 words of the article show exactly why it shouldn't be in Wikipedia. It's a word and it's supposedly coined. We need to be able to verify it. Mgm|^(talk) 08:32, Apr 5, 2005 (UTC)
• Comment: I took out the phrase "supposedly coined by Jacques Maritain" because of the following quote; "The epistemological chronolâtry is an obsessionnal fixation on the passing of time. Not to be 'trendy' is the She'ol (hell)."—Jacques Maritain. Le Paysan de la Garonne. Desclée de Brouwer, Paris, 1966. p.26. Also, Le Paysan de la Garonne gets 257 hits at Google, which is not bad for an out-of-print French philosophy book; The English translation, The Peasant of the Garonne: An Old Layman Questions Himself About the Present Time, gets 392 hits. -DialUp 15:09, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• I think that DialUp's links demonstrate the notability of the book, but not the term. However it seems to me that it is an important concept, Merge with Jacques Maritain Dsmdgold 01:46, Apr 9, 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.