Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Futility

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. Joyous 16:42, Mar 6, 2005 (UTC)

Futility[edit]

I think this is a hoax, if it's not it's a dic def. Either way, I think it should be deleted. Mgm|^(talk) 11:20, Feb 28, 2005 (UTC)

Looks like nonsense to me. Delete Radiant! 12:02, Feb 28, 2005 (UTC)
Delete, Inter\^Echo 12:36, 28 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Delete. Wanted to be a dicdef, landed on "rambling nonsense/original research". HyperZonk^talk 18:23, Feb 28, 2005 (UTC)
Delete. I considered keep, but then I realized that it would be futile. DaveTheRed 23:53, 28 Feb 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.