Talk:Alexander Technique

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Alexander Technique article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9: 30 days

The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to complementary and alternative medicine, which has been designated as a contentious topic.

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

Dance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dance, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Dance and Dance-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DanceWikipedia:WikiProject DanceTemplate:WikiProject DanceDance articles

WikiProject Dance To-do list:

To nominate at WP:FAC:
To improve to Featured standard:
To nominate as a Good article:
To expand: 18th century dance - 20th century ballet - Bolero - Choreography on Broadway - Dance education - English ballet - Indian classical dance - Italian ballet - List of dance companies - Meg Stuart - Opera ballet - Sasha Waltz - Scotch reel - Set dance - Physically integrated dance
To cleanup: Contra dance - Salsa (dance) - Dandiya - Lead and follow
To unbias:
To check for copyvios:
To merge: List of dancers and List of dance personalities‎ as per AfD discussion
Substubs needing expansion: see /substubs
To destub: Amir Hossain Babu - Canada Dance Festival - Dance etiquette - Flash dance - more
Needing references: Chorus line - specifically verifying that each girl actually started out as a chorine
To create: Broadway dance - Country Western Dance International - Dance and cinema - Dance and society - German folk dancing - Latin swing - Post-structuralist ballet - Push (dance) - Salon dance - Shuffle dance - Swing boogie - World Dance Alliance - Xavier Le Roy - more
Wanted Pics/Graphics: Category:Dance articles needing images

Alternative medicine

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Alternative medicine, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Alternative medicine related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Alternative medicineWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative medicineTemplate:WikiProject Alternative medicineAlternative medicine articles

Skepticism Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article was nominated for deletion on 28 September 2010. The result of the discussion was keep.

Need additional input[edit]

My points are being ignored and stonewalled; please other editors some additional feedback? 72.89.19.118 (talk) 16:33, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You could always post at WP:FT/N to get HUNDREDs of eyes. Bon courage (talk) 16:34, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I think the new lede looks pretty good, how could we work in mind body intervention without disrupting your tingling fringe senses? 2604:CA00:16B:9E4F:0:0:665:BBD7 (talk) 16:36, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That is truly a WP:DEADHORSE judging by the archives stuffed with discussion of it. There seems to be a WP:POVSOURCING issue with the desire to 'work in' certain wording, then finding the sources to match. You can post to WP:FT/N if you want wide input. Bon courage (talk) 16:40, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The wording is what most accurately describes the subject of the wiki; it seems that proving the subject as invalid is more important than describing the subject accurately to some editors. Which program fits better with the mission if wikipedia? 72.89.19.118 (talk) 17:02, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You can post to WP:FT/N if you want wide input. Bon courage (talk) 17:04, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Also it's not even the wording I would choose it's the most accurate category that describes AT under the banner of alt med. provided by wiki 72.89.19.118 (talk) 17:04, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've been following these discussions, and I agree with Bon courage et al. It feels to me very much like a DEADHORSE situation. --Tryptofish (talk) 23:21, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NPOVN#Guerilla Skepticism on Wikipedia project (GSoW). --Tryptofish (talk) 23:28, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Watchlisted. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 01:30, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Why isn't this article semi'd? SandyGeorgia (Talk) 02:11, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good question. Bon courage (talk) 05:24, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ANI may be a better venue. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 13:44, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Incorporating concepts from mindfulness[edit]

I'm unclear how "incorporating concepts from mindfulness" is due in the lede without mention elsewhere in the article, nor how Alexander was able to access and incorporate such concepts in its development. Instead, this sounds like an after-the-fact categorization and rationalization of the practice. - Hipal (talk) 16:51, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It's mentioned in the SBM piece cited, and also in this one.[1] We don't mirror other definitional stuff between lede body and it seems harmless enough. I agree it probably is a retro-fit to try and surf the mindfulness wave of a few years ago. Bon courage (talk) 16:58, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It shouldn't be in the first sentence then. --Hipal (talk) 17:12, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have no strong preference for my edit - have at it! Bon courage (talk) 17:12, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

How's this?

The Alexander Technique, named after its developer Frederick Matthias Alexander (1869–1955), is a type of alternative therapy incorporating concepts from mindfulness.^[1]^[2] It is based on the idea that poor posture gives rise to a range of health problems.^[1]^[3]^: 221 The American National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health classifies it as a "Complementary Psychological and Physical Health Approach" (mind-body intervention). ^[4] When used together with mainstream methods AT is considered complementary, when used in place of conventional medicine, it's considered alternative.^[4] 2600:4040:9144:8500:C178:4813:C963:A4F (talk) 17:39, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for seeing that mindfulness is an important part of classifying AT. 2600:4040:9144:8500:C178:4813:C963:A4F (talk) 17:17, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ ^a ^b Cite error: The named reference ee150 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
^ Cite error: The named reference aus17 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
^ Cite error: The named reference bloch was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
^ ^a ^b Cite error: The named reference NCCIH3/10/2023 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).

The WP:LEDE summarizes and introduces the article. Because this isn't mentioned elsewhere in the article, the addition to the lede is problematic. --Hipal (talk) 18:12, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Well obviously the article is lacking a lot of meat that was hacked out in previous edits and not replaced with anything beyond Ernst for a while. As Bon Courage pointed out there is support in the sourcing and every independent source on AT calls it a "mind-body" method. 2600:4040:913E:EF00:C178:4813:C963:A4F (talk) 19:14, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Either way it is a nearly content-free descriptor which doesn't belong in the lead. We should be using the opening lines to explain what it actually is, not to put in marketing buzzwords. While we're at it the quotes attributed to the NCCIH (a famously fringe body) should be cut as well. MrOllie (talk) 19:17, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Agree on all counts. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 20:28, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

These are the only sources that give any kind of specific descriptors. You guys are on a mission to make the wiki as vague and meaningless as possible. Mind-body practices, somatics, mindfulness, MECPs are all nearly synonymous. What is a generic term is alternative med/.therapy, complementary therapy... Those labels surely do apply but a more specific description should follow. 2604:CA00:17C:1B94:0:0:663:ED88 (talk) 22:58, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quickly sweeping away entire fields of study? 2604:CA00:17C:1B94:0:0:663:ED88 (talk) 22:59, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

First sentence - no teacher would agree with[edit]

Regarding the second half of the first sentence of this article: ¨is a type of alternative therapy based on the idea that poor posture gives rise to a range of health problems.¨ I believe I can safely say that no Alexander technique teacher would agree with this statement. Typically it is not referred to as a therapy, the use of the word posture will mislead the reader, and AT is not focussed on relieving specific health problems but rather on changing global habits. What about this sentence: ¨The Alexander Technique (AT) is an approach to changing habits of postural support, muscle tension, movement, attention, and reactivity.¨ ( https://alexandertechniquescience.com/general-at/what-is-alexander-technique/ ) 213.93.108.91 (talk) 07:19, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This has been discussed ad nauseam; see this Talk page and its archives. As a 'real world' check I look online at what AT vendors are offering and straight away see it being touted for asthma,[2] Looks to me like a classic Motte and bailey fallacy is in play. When challenged, AT vendors are like 'me!? medical!? oh no!" but left to their own devices they are happy to advertise with medical claims. Bon courage (talk) 07:42, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[ee150-1] Cite error: The named reference ee150 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).

[aus17-2] Cite error: The named reference aus17 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).

[bloch-3] Cite error: The named reference bloch was invoked but never defined (see the help page).

[NCCIH3/10/2023-4] Cite error: The named reference NCCIH3/10/2023 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]