Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Theresa knott vs. Mr-Natural-Health/arbitrator discussion
Recommendations of Delirium[edit]
"3. Mr. Natural Health is instructed to refrain from editing articles themselves (this does not include talk pages) for a period of one week, so as to allow mediation to progress."
The above statement is factually incorrect as I received no such notification during the mediation process.
See forwarded copy of email below.
--- Jussi-Ville Heiskanen <****> wrote:
- > Subject: Commencing with mediation
- > From: Jussi-Ville Heiskanen <****>
- > To: John Gohde <****>, T KNOTT
- > <****>
- > Date: 27 Jan 2004 11:58:13 +0200
- >
- > To ensure a productive mediation process, the following ground
- > rules
- > would be useful:
- >
- > - That when you have a comment to make to each other, for the
- > duration
- > of the mediation, you send your comments to me, to relay on.
- > It would
- > be _most_ useful that you not communicate directly to each
- > other during
- > the mediation. I promise not to censor anything you want to
- > send to each
- > other, but please send the message _through_ me. (I promise
- > not to
- > remove a punctuation mark.)
- >
- > - That if you have something you want to express to me in
- > confidence,
- > without passing it on to anyone, not the other person, not
- > other
- > mediators, not anyone on the arbitration panel, not Jimbo
- > Wales, nor
- > any outside actor, please enclose such comments within your
- > message
- > between *! and !* signs. *!This would be a confidential
- > comment!*
- >
- > - If you have a comment within a message which you do not hold
- > confidential, but is directed to me, rather than the other one
- > in this
- > mediation, you may separate it by *** on both sides. Like
- > this:
- > ***This is an aside to you, make what use of it you like***
- >
- > ----------------
- > I will be sending the following emails to you both in short
- > order, while
- > you await them, please absorb the ground rules above most
- > carefully.
- >
- > Emails, to come shortly:
- >
- > Disclaimer of my affinity to both you disputants
- >
- > Easy questions to answer in short order
- >
- > (further emails will be detailed within those emails)
- >
- > --
- > Jussi-Ville Heiskanen
-- Mr-Natural-Health 17:26, 11 Feb 2004 (UTC)
- Delirium was not making a statement about how you have been instructed. Rather sie was making a statement about how you would have been instructed, had the arbitration committee accepted hir recommendation. Sorry for any confusion caused. Martin 18:55, 11 Feb 2004 (UTC)
- Yes, sorry for the confusion. I was proposing that the arbitration committee order a second round of mediation with some additional restrictions, one of them being that MNH not be allowed to edit articles during the first week. The rest of the committee did not adopt this proposal, so it turns out to not be an issue. --Delirium 21:35, Feb 11, 2004 (UTC)
privacy rights[edit]
Regarding privacy rights, Wikipedia's consistent and repeated violations of user privacy rights is the worst that I have ever witnessed on the Web. I cannot accept any findings to the contrary.
I the user decide what personal information and outside activities of mine are to be disclosed on Wikipedia, NOT YOU! This is not debatable.
And, I have notified you that have YOU have violated my right to privacy on a repeated basis. --Mr-Natural-Health 17:38, 11 Feb 2004 (UTC)
a notorious internet troll.[edit]
My activities outside of Wikipedia are NONE of YOUR business, period. :) -- Mr-Natural-Health 17:42, 11 Feb 2004 (UTC)
An accredited health web site[edit]
I operate an accredited health web site, because an outside authority has ruled that my web site respects the users right to privacy. -- Mr-Natural-Health 17:44, 11 Feb 2004 (UTC)