User talk:Nephelin~enwiki

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome[edit]

Hello, welcome to Wikipedia.


You can help improve the articles listed below! This list updates frequently, so check back here for more tasks to try. (See Wikipedia:Maintenance or the Task Center for further information.)

Help counter systemic bias by creating new articles on important women.

Help improve popular pages, especially those of low quality.


You might find these links helpful in creating new pages or helping with the above tasks: How to edit a page, How to write a great article, Naming conventions, Manual of Style. You should read our policies at some point too.

If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. If you made any edits before you got an account, you might be interested in assigning those to your username. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian!

  • You can sign your name using three tildes, like this: ~~~. If you use four, you can add a datestamp too.
  • If you ever think a page or image should be deleted, please list it at the votes for deletion page. There is also a votes for undeletion page if you want to retrieve something that you think should not have been deleted.

Again, welcome! - UtherSRG 05:47, 25 Jan 2004 (UTC)


Hi Nephelin. Welcome from me too. Re Reflection (computer science) - all headers begin with == to begin with and work down from there. It may look a little big at first, but it is aesthetically and logically better...

Thanks, and keep contributing! Dysprosia 04:04, 16 Feb 2004 (UTC)

Sorry, but the headlines from "Cologne Blue" are neither aesthetically nor typographically better. The main title (H1) and the H2 headline is equal in size. And short articles with many headlines are heavy to read (if you ever find some textual information between these headlines). The way to outline an article is to use paragraphs (like in school). Nephelin 01:17, 17 Feb 2004 (UTC)

Joschka Fischer[edit]

Please have a look at Talk:Joseph Martin Fischer -- and think about changing the article back to Joschka Fischer. -- till we *) 14:40, 7 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Nephelin. Sorry for my bad english. I have changed the Joschka Fischer articles to Jospeh Martin Fischer in the german wikipedia (see version history of de:Joschka Fischer or de:Joseph Martin Fischer and earned a lot of trouble. Ok, thats democracy. Please can you tell me, if you / or what differences you have with some of the germen wikipedian users. thanks. ps in my opinion your changes were correct, cause there does not exist a person (or pseudonyme) called joscha fischer (it's a nickname) de:Benutzer:Malteser 82.82.96.175 23:19, 14 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Jonathanbrandis.jpg[edit]

Image Copyright problem
Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Jonathanbrandis.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 02:17, 11 December 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Remember the dot (talk) 02:17, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Oskar Schindler.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Oskar Schindler.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:07, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Hildesheim Germany Location.png[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Hildesheim Germany Location.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 03:08, 21 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. FASTILYsock(TALK) 03:08, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Oskar Schindler.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Hoops gza (talk) 23:26, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your account will be renamed[edit]

02:07, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed[edit]

16:52, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:14, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]