Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2004/Candidate statements/Endorsements/Ta bu shi da yu

Ta bu shi da yu

Withdrawal

I am extremely appreciative of everyone who voted for me! But, bad news guys and girls. I'm withdrawing :( I don't think I'd be up for the job, purely and simply. I can be a bit abrasive myself! That's not to say I can't be relatively neutral, it just means that other people are better at this job and should get more of a chance than myself.

If you want to support others, my recommendations are Raul654 and Ambi. Others are good, just I trust these two the most.

Ta bu shi da yu 01:53, 1 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Support

• Single-handedly broke my unopposed support record for adminship and still going strong. Support. -- Grunt 🇪🇺 01:37, 2004 Nov 18 (UTC)
• Strongly endorse... in fact, I think the ArbCom should be made up entirely of good-hearted Aussies. ;-) func(talk) 19:59, 18 Nov 2004 (UTC)
• Support. Another one of the few level-headed Wikipedians I've seen around often since my arrival here. He's been a good admin (from what I've looked at), and a good person for this role. Shem 15:04, 21 Nov 2004 (UTC)
• Support. Theresa Knott (Tart, knees hot) 18:19, 21 Nov 2004 (UTC)
• Support - Xed 19:45, 22 Nov 2004 (UTC)
• Support, OneGuy 14:03, 26 Nov 2004 (UTC)
• 142% Support, Very hard working, very neutral, very good-hearted, very aussie. What more could you ask? The bellman 11:25, 2004 Nov 27 (UTC)
• Support Nice, Level-Headed, and Corteous--Josiah 22:41, 27 Nov 2004 (UTC)
• Support --Jondel 10:54, 29 Nov 2004 (UTC)
• Support! - Sarge Baldy 20:14, Nov 29, 2004 (UTC)
• Support Quick & insightful in addressing trouble spots. MPerel 00:04, Dec 1, 2004 (UTC)

Oppose

• Oppose. Takes sides, does not understand rules, and even defends sysops breaking rules. HistoryBuffEr 01:28, 2004 Dec 1 (UTC)
  • I would dispute this, but I guess everyone is entitled to their opinion. - Ta bu shi da yu 01:47, 1 Dec 2004 (UTC)