Talk:Leyton

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Waltham Forest, London not Essex[edit]

Leyton is in London, specifically in the London Borough of Waltham Forest. While historically it was part of Essex, it is important that the lede is simple, clear and not misleading / confusing. I have moved all the historically aspects to the second paragragh. Can we discuss edits that change this order, before just 'reverting to old wording'? Jonnyspeed20 (talk) 17:16, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Oliver Close[edit]

There was a decision made to redirect the article Oliver Close (Estates) to Leyton. An editor has now deleted the redirect and written a stub about Oliver Close. Any concerns about this? I notice there's a link in this article to Oliver Close now, so maybe it's a good idea. -- Rob C (Alarob) 18:08, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]


I don't think this should even be in Wikipedia. It holds no significance as far as I'm concerned. It's just a small housing area in Leyton. The fact that it is built on a bronze age settlement isn't enough because I'm fairly sure _most_ buildings in London area built on or around historical settlements! --87.75.28.66 (talk) 16:56, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Over the past 15 years[edit]

How can someone seriously put this in an article? It is a phrase from a news item. Dates, please. Also, what does "partially bisected mean?

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Leyton. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:49, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Leyton. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:43, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]