Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neocolours
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. Joyous 00:07, Jan 14, 2005 (UTC)
Neocolours[edit]
Advertising --BesigedB (talk) 22:03, 7 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Vanity/advertising. Sockatume, Talk 23:54, 7 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, disgustingly saccharine page. Oh ya, it's non-notable too. --foobaz·✎ 00:15, 8 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, ad. Wyss 02:17, 8 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, advertising, spam, not notable. Somebody in the WWW 02:56, 8 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Comment: This was speedy deleted by Ferkelparade right as BesigedB was adding the VfD header (which recreated the article). At 17:32, 8 Jan 2005, Jpgordon speedy deleted it as content previously deleted. Since prior speedy deletions may not be used as justification to "speedy as recreated content", it has to be evaluated on its own merits. While I see nothing in this article which justifies an encyclopedia article, I also see nothing that qualifies this as a candidate for speedy deletion according to our very specific criteria. I have temporarily restored it in order to allow the VfD discussion to continue. Rossami (talk) 05:16, 9 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Added beaurocracy on a technicality of timing. Pfft :P --BesigedB (talk) 15:31, 9 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Comment: Nope. I would have restored it regardless. An article must meet the strict and specific standards at WP:CSD before it can be speedy deleted. We deliberately set the bar high for speedy deletes. Vanity/advertising are judgment calls which belong here according to the current rules of CSD. Rossami (talk)
- Added beaurocracy on a technicality of timing. Pfft :P --BesigedB (talk) 15:31, 9 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Delete ad. --Deathphoenix 04:58, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.