User talk:Gary

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from User talk:GaryKing)

Good article reassessment for Scarborough, Ontario[edit]

Scarborough, Ontario has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 19:34, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Outline banners with bad inputs indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 01:28, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Gary, good to see you're editing. You nominated this one at WP:FAC a long time ago. I'm thinking of rerunning this one at WP:TFA on July 1 ... the article seems to me to be in pretty good shape. Any thoughts pro or con? - Dank (push to talk) 06:07, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, go ahead, sounds good. Gary (talk) 19:12, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. The tool User:Phlsph7/HighlightUnreferencedPassages.js pointed out that the last paragraph, about Settlers, Rails & Trails, is unreferenced. Do you happen to have a reference? Would you rather pull it if we can't find a reference? - Dank (push to talk) 19:37, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nope, I don't have a reference for that. You can remove it, if you want. Gary (talk) 21:09, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Job growth has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 29 § Job growth until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 00:02, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Vxtreme[edit]

Information icon Hello, Gary. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Vxtreme, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:05, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Vxtreme[edit]

Hello, Gary. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Vxtreme".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 06:48, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Mesh conference has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This conference article is missing a reliable source to establish notability. The first two references are from blog/promotional websites; the other two refrences are dead links. After searching, found social media and event announcement websites, but no comprehensive, in-depth coverage of this conference itself. Article was created on 10 March 2010.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]