User talk:Cfs-news

Welcome!

Hello, Cfs-news, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! SaltyPig 22:50, 2005 Jun 1 (UTC)

Watergate scandal[edit]

i was getting ready to revert your recent paragraph addition to this article, but saw that you appear to be new here, and wanted to spare you that shock i got when one of my first contributions was reverted. my problem with the addition is that it's, in my opinion, unnecessarily wordy, and contained unencyclopedic phrases such as, "A few might speculate". in particular, this sentence is, in my opinion, ungrammatical and almost unreadable:

"But because such an action would be so highly unethical, and because President Nixon had such a relative advantage in the polls and so such an illicit action would be so foolhardy with much to lose if discovered, therefore any link between the president's re-election campaign and this "third -rate burglary" was unimaginable for the vast majority of Americans at this early point in the scandal."

the standard wikipedia recommendation is that i should just make the changes i see fit, rather than considering you the "author" of the section. however, since wikipedia can be a strange situation to get used to, i wanted to run it by you first. i'll be happy to discuss further with you, or i will make the changes if you don't. SaltyPig 22:50, 2005 Jun 1 (UTC)

Merge discussion for Walt Whitman Birthplace[edit]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Walt Whitman Birthplace, has been proposed to be merged into another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. • Gene93k (talk) 17:03, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Canova (medicine)[edit]

A tag has been placed on Canova (medicine), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. Chasingsol ^(talk) 16:43, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]