Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alethea W. McCormick

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Alethea W. McCormick[edit]

Alethea W. McCormick was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was delete.

Vanity article. User:134.181.37.132 (who briefly used the account User:Nywalton and then went back to the anon ip) has begun creating articles on himself and his entire family - Nathaniel Y. Walton, Alethea W. McCormick and David S. Walton. I've also warned 134.181 that he will be blocked if he keeps removing vfd notices. Gamaliel 20:00, 9 Dec 2004 (UTC)

  • Delete. Katefan0 21:03, Dec 9, 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete. This is getting silly. — [[User:Knowledge Seeker|Knowledge Seeker দ (talk)]] 22:51, 9 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete. Being a "proud father" is no excuse for starting vanity pages. --MarkSweep 00:44, 10 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete. Vanity... P Ingerson 01:21, 10 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete. Actually, I suspect this is being created by her brother... If deleted, also delete the redirect Alethea Meigs (Walton) McCormick. Rossami (talk) 02:51, 10 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete. Vanity. Does the whole family not all have articles yet? -R. fiend 07:55, 10 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete along with rest of contiguous family articles. Vanity. --Improv 19:25, 10 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete. reasons listed above. Gsd97jks 22:59, 14 Dec 2004 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like other '/delete' pages is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.