Talk:Tracey Emin

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Tracey Emin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:24, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Missing key bio details[edit]

Odd that Emin's page is missing her full DOB (3rd July) and her middle name (Karima). These are not hard to find – they're available on her Britannica page here (article researched and written by their arts editor, Kathleen Kuiper, as credited at the top of the page). I was going to add this info myself but thought I'd ask why it's been removed first? Thanks --Jkaharper (talk) 18:39, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Cleanup template[edit]

I have removed the following from the top of the article:

It is nearly five years old. There have been around 300 edits in that time, Does anyone think it is still pertinent? Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 22:02, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Good work. Absolutely not pertinent and the other ones should be removed as well. Whoever defaces articles with these boxes ought to either organise people to fix whatever they find objectionable, or it fix themselves or just not put the boxes there; instead of feeling like they've done 'stellar and important editing work' by generating an eyesore. I'm tired of seeing them.86.87.191.180 (talk) 18:14, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]