User talk:Jcsutton

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome! -- [[User:MacGyverMagic|Mgm|^(talk)]] 11:05, Nov 9, 2004 (UTC)
P.S. Please don't forget to use wikification and formatting in your articles. Also, try to written using complete sentences.

The Humungous Image Tagging Project[edit]

Hi. You've helped with the Wikipedia:WikiProject Wiki Syntax, so I thought it worth alerting you to the latest and greatest of Wikipedia fixing project, User:Yann/Untagged Images, which is seeking to put copyright tags on all of the untagged images. There are probably, oh, thirty thousand or so to do (he said, reaching into the air for a large figure). But hey: they're images ... you'll get to see lots of random pretty pictures. That must be better than looking for at at and the the, non? You know you'll love it. best wishes --Tagishsimon (talk)

TfD nomination of Template:2004Earthquake[edit]

Template:2004Earthquake has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you.

Clam Article[edit]

Hello. This is Sidious1701. I was the one who put in the taxobox the second time. I left a comment on the clam talk page about the taxobox and you didn't respond. Anyway, it says in the first line that the clam belongs to the family Bivalvia and I think the genus Mollusca. So clearly, it does have a classification. If you have any proof there is no classification, leave a comment on my talk page.Sidious1701 19:45, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Just made another note on the clam discussion page. I'm no biologist, and I have no proof, just the quick google results at the time. Although as posted on the discussion page, Encarta seems to concur with your research. Jcsutton 14:10, 5 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Groo cover issue1.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Groo cover issue1.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 08:59, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Triad symbol.gif[edit]

An image that you uploaded or altered, File:Triad symbol.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. ~ JohnnyMrNinja 02:41, 24 February 2009 (UTC) --~ JohnnyMrNinja 02:41, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of American Herbal Pharmacopoeia and Therapeutic Compendium[edit]

A tag has been placed on American Herbal Pharmacopoeia and Therapeutic Compendium requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for organizations and companies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Ironholds (talk) 12:36, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of American Herbal Pharmacopoeia and Therapeutic Compendium[edit]

I have nominated American Herbal Pharmacopoeia and Therapeutic Compendium, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/American Herbal Pharmacopoeia and Therapeutic Compendium. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Ironholds (talk) 13:06, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Groo rufferto.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Groo rufferto.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:56, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of American Herbal Pharmacopoeia for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article American Herbal Pharmacopoeia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/American Herbal Pharmacopoeia until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. JayJay^{What did I do?} 23:34, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]