Talk:Canton of Zürich

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

Can we please talk about the spelling of Zürich/Zurich? Thanks. Kokiri 10:36, 26 Jan 2004 (UTC)

Not much response there. I think the English is Zurich. Zuerich would certainly be wrong. But then I think the Polish port is Gdansk in English, without a diacritic on the n. --Audiovideo 01:04, 15 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Before you spend any time on this discussion, you should look at archives: Talk:Zürich. I don't know how that ended... 71.77.12.236 06:17, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

German or Swiss?[edit]

Züritüütsch looks like a written form of Swiss German to me. German does not usually have the "üü" construct. Wallie 07:28, 20 May 2006 (UTC) ü[reply]

By the way, the audio-pronounciation of zürich is wrong, the way it's said is maybe swiss-german but not srandart-german. the "ch" in zürich is not like "kh" in "Khalid", its more like "zürish", because english don't have "ch" pronounced that way —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.132.163.78 (talk) 10:03, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It's not wrong. It's the correct pronunciation in the Swiss accent in standard German. The Swiss German name for Zurich is simply "Züri". — tooki (talk) 21:01, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Canton of Zürich. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:16, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Canton of Zürich. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:43, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Im Stemmer[edit]

@FL9499: Both, the offical BW cartography as well as swisstopo write the places' name as Im Stemmer. -- 18:53, 18 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I have seen that as well. But Büsingen belongs to Germany, so I feel swisstopo at least is not relevant. search.ch maps state 'Im Stemmer' as well, but are they relevant? As mentioned in my edit summary, the 'Gemeinde' uses just 'Stemmer' and the roadsigns state Ortsteil Stemmer at both ends of the hamlet and on both sides of the signs. FL9499 (talk) 19:10, 18 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I see, and I assume you are right, but this would not be enough for WP:VER. It is not that important at all, so let it be as it is. BTW: Please follow the formatting conventions for WP:TALKPAGEs.
Five examples of contemporary use:
http://www.vbsh.ch/images/pdf/fahrplaene/2018_Fahrplan_Randen_Reiat.pdf
https://farm4.staticflickr.com/3007/2625069587_d7ed06d74c_b.jpg
https://www.flickr.com/photos/jag9889/36083762534/
http://www.ostwind.ch/sites/default/files/downloads/T651.9_Verbundtarif_FlexTax-1.pdf
http://busfrei.startbilder.de/1200/173954-bus-haltestelle-buesingen-521322.jpg FL9499 (talk) 19:40, 18 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I see. Never mind. But please use the intention colons when writing WP:TALKPAGE answers, thanks. -- ZH8000 (talk) 19:59, 18 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Inconsistency in HDI across Wikipedia Articles[edit]

This article boasts an HDI of 0.989, yet the List of subnational entities with the highest and lowest Human Development Index puts Zurich at 0.966, plus the wrong Zurich is mentioned and the list is kinda glitched out. I should probably put this in the talk page of that article. TheHeartbroken1 (talk) 16:39, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]