John Hagelin was one of the Natural sciences good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Transcendental Meditation movement, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Transcendental Meditation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Transcendental Meditation movementWikipedia:WikiProject Transcendental Meditation movementTemplate:WikiProject Transcendental Meditation movementTranscendental Meditation movement articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pennsylvania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PennsylvaniaWikipedia:WikiProject PennsylvaniaTemplate:WikiProject PennsylvaniaPennsylvania articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pittsburgh, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pittsburgh and its metropolitan area on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PittsburghWikipedia:WikiProject PittsburghTemplate:WikiProject PittsburghPittsburgh articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
This topic contains controversial issues, some of which have reached a consensus for approach and neutrality, and some of which may be disputed.
Before making any potentially controversial changes to the article, please carefully read the discussion-page dialogue to see if the issue has been raised before, and ensure that your edit meets all of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Please also ensure you use an accurate and concise edit summary.
This page has archives. Sections older than 45 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present.
The following Wikipedia contributors may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
Hagelin was invited to be a plenary speaker at the 2007 Quantum Mind conference in Salzburg, Austria, organized by Stuart Hameroff (University of Arizona) and Gustav Bernroider (University of Salzburg).[citation needed]
I realize that nobody cares, but I question the accuracy of the quotation of "the square root of one percent of the population". The square root of (one percent) is simply ten percent. The (square root of one) percent is one percent. Or is this a typo for "the square root of minus one percent" which may be some mystical reference to the quantum language of the probability-squared function? TomS TDotO (talk) 05:02, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I have pointed this out before on the TM talk page (that sqrt(1%) = 10%), and even changed the wording in the article to reflect the intended meaning, which is sqrt(P)/10. It just gets changed back.Rracecarr (talk) 14:41, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I'm sorry, but I don't understand your explanation. Why not just say "10%" or "1%" or "i%"? TomS TDotO (talk) 16:11, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
In a nutshell: the Maharishi effect was originally supposed to require 1% of a given population. With the advent of the Sidhi program, which was supposedly more powerful, it was necessary to shrink that requirement. Rather than change the 1% requirement, the Maharishi decided to take the previous number (say, 100 people out of a population of 10,000) and take the square root of that number (giving 10 in this example). Anyone fluent in mathematics would express this as, out of a population of P, sqrt(P)/10, but partly to retain the link to the former 1% claim, and partly, I think, due to mathematical illiteracy, the standard phrasing seems to be "the square root of one percent". Rracecarr (talk) 16:38, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
If I understand what you're saying, it is what I would express as "one percent of the square root of the population". But I've lost what little interest I had. TomS TDotO (talk) 17:34, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Nope. Ten percent of the square root of the population. Not one percent. Over and out. Rracecarr (talk) 17:39, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
what they mean is described here from MUM; it says: "Taking into account the “1%” finding, it was predicted that a group with size equal to the square root of 1% of a population would have a measurable influence on the quality of life of that population. For example, a group of 200 practicing the TM-Sidhi program together in a city of four million (100 x 200 x 200) would be sufficient to produce a measurable influence on the whole city; a group of 1,600 in the U.S. would influence 256 million (100 x 1600 x 1600) people, the whole population of the U.S.; and a group of 7,000 would influence 4.9 billion (100 x 7000 x 7000) people, the population of the world at that time."
the ambiguity is which "of" to make the break at. you are reading it as the-square-root-of-one-percent of the population, but they mean the square root of one-percent-of-the-population. The formula is: # of mediators = sqrt(population x .01) . Jytdog (talk) 19:08, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I have just modified one external link on John Hagelin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
.jpg){kind=small}
