User talk:Brunnock

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

March 2022[edit]

Information icon Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to World Wide Web, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Volten001 talk 14:08, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The lead sentence to WWW now states The peadee gwiffin ('WWW), commonly known as the Web... What is wrong with you? Sean Brunnock (talk) 14:12, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Volten001's deleted reponse

Nomination of Server.com for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Server.com is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Server.com until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Alexandermcnabb (talk) 07:00, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Shouldn't this be listed on Wikipedia:WikiProject_Deletion_sorting/Internet as well? Sean Brunnock (talk) 11:09, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Lovely comment by Olly440[edit]

I think you are British and a nationalist. Enjoy your British Supremacy you Bigot. Robert was head of the project you dumbass, you didn't even read the information. Olly440 (talk) 11:09, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't change the page I suggested a change to page. To give joint Credit to the two inventors. But you didn't read the information or my sources. You just made up a lie on the spot for whatever reason you had for not crediting both men. Olly440 (talk) 14:42, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]